- RSS FeedSubscribe
- « Previous PostReading Classics Together: The Holiness of God (II)
- Next Post »A La Carte (10/22)
How I Got Here (Part 2)
- 10/21/10
- 29
Yesterday I began writing about How I Got Here in an article that somehow began to turn into a loose autobiography. I got as far as walking into my first day at a new high school and being confronted by a cute girl whose first words to me were "If you ever tell anyone, I'll kill you. I'll absolutely kill you."
So there I was in Ancaster High, a new Christian and a terribly unmotivated student. For the first semester I enjoyed spending lots of time with that girl; we’d spend our first class together every day and found that we had a lot in common. I seem to recall asking her to go to a youth group function with me once or twice, but she wasn’t interested. She wasn’t a believer, she was seeing another guy, and seemed to just enjoy me as a friend. And that was great. Second semester came around and since we no longer had any classes together we pretty much lost touch.
I finished up at Ancaster High and earned grades that were good enough to get me into McMaster University, a school just down the hill in Hamilton. I could live at home which suited me fine as I didn’t have any real interest in going away. My only real memories of the first year of university are playing euchre (I played a ton of euchre that year) and of getting my first email account. I certainly did not do a lot of work. I didn’t party as so many people do in their first year (and, in fact, never went through those wild years so common to even Christian teens). I just rode the bus to school, played euchre, went to my classes and went back home. I continued attending those Dutch Reformed churches, though I was beginning to feel a certain distance from them as time went on.
In the summer between my first and second years of university a strange thing happened. The phone rang one day; my little sister Susanna answered, handed me the phone and said with a smirk, “It’s your girlfriend.” It wasn’t my girlfriend (I actually hadn’t ever had a girlfriend); instead, it was Aileen, that girl from high school. She was calling under the pretense of asking me about McMaster University. She told me that she had been looking at her options for university the next year, had remembered that I was heading to McMaster, and thought she’d ask me about the school. The strange thing is that her father had worked at McMaster for twenty years (as I’m sure I reminded her) and would be more than capable of answering any of her questions. It turns out that she actually wanted to ask me as her date to a murder mystery party; she was no longer seeing that other guy and needed someone to go with her. Now the phone call made a little bit more sense. When I told my parents about this call my mom said, “Wow. Isn’t that a little forward of her?”
I was way too timid to go to a party where I didn’t know most of the people, so I turned her down. She called me a little while later and asked me if I’d like to go somewhere else (our memories have faded and we can’t quite remember what it is). I shot her down again, too bashful to meet new people. But through that summer we began to talk on the phone and eventually I got up the nerve to ask her to go out for ice cream. When we met up I explained that I was a Christian and she wasn’t and therefore I couldn’t date her. We could be friends but nothing more. And then we promptly started to date anyway, largely out of the eye of my parents who would have been understandly concerned about this.
But God was good despite my missionary dating. Within a few months the Lord saved Aileen and she made a profession of faith. We began attending a different church in town, one outside the denomination I had been part of for so many years. And there I found a new excitement in my faith. We made many dear friends and grew a lot in our knowledge of the Bible. In the summer of 1998, about 3 years after we began dating, Aileen and I got married. The girl who first threatened to kill me became my wife. We were young (I was 21, she was 22), we were poor (she was intending to do one more year of university and I was working at Starbucks) but we loved one another and thought that life would always be this fun and easy.
Now the purpose of these articles was to talk about a few years that provide the backdrop for the beginning of this blog. And we’re almost there. In 1998 Aileen and I got married and in early 2000 our son was born. This was where our theological convictions began to change. Shortly after Nicholas was born we had a bit of a difficult situation with our church. The elders were expressing to us that we ought to have him baptized right away; we were rather hesitant. Though we had always held to infant baptism, it was not until we actually had to think about having our own son baptized that we really investigated it. And I soon began to feel that infant baptism was not biblical. I told the elders about my hesitation and this led to some confusing circumstances where we felt we were being told we were free to take some time to invesitgate but where we soon found that the elders were beginning the early stages of church discipline. I do not remember all the details. I do know that Aileen and I were young and arrogant and that the elders were godly men who truly wanted to honor the Lord. So I bear no animosity toward them. I believe it was right of me to withhold baptism, but I’m sure the way we went around expressing this was full of youthful stupidity.
Right around this time I found a job in the computer field (along the way I had graduated with a degree in history and then gone to school to pick up a fistfull of computer certifications) in the town of Oakville. We decided that we would move to Oakville to be closer to work. This gave us an “out” of the situation where we could leave our church on good terms but without baptizing our son. And that’s what we did. For a couple of months we attended a local Baptist church, quite literally our first sustained experience outside the Dutch Reformed fold. And then we packed up and moved to Oakville.
We were now in a new town and ready for a fresh start. We knew no one in the community and knew nothing of any of the churches. So we pulled out a phone book, turned to the listing of Baptist churches, and started visiting them.
There’s one thing I need to point out here. When we left the Dutch Reformed churches, we believed that we were leaving behind our Reformed faith. I had heard the term “Reformed Baptist” but thought it a contradiction in terms. As we left those Reformed churches we were deliberately leaving behind that Reformed heritage, hoping to find a church that would have good theology but, more importantly (at least in our minds) a desire to evangelize, to take the gospel into the surrounding communities. We had never been part of a church that emphasized evangelism or really seemed to understand its importance; in all the years I was in these churches, Aileen was, quite literally, the only adult I ever saw baptized—the only adult anyone ever saw baptized. There was lots of internal growth but non-existent conversion growth. And this was very disappointing to me. I longed for a church that would be faithful in evangelism and I became convinced that this could only happen outside the context of Reformed theology.
And so we moved to Oakville ready to become Baptists, ready to forget about all the Reformed theology I had been raised on. I had still never read any Christian books and had almost no knowledge of the Christian world outside the context of those Dutch Reformed churches (the one exception being the ministry of Charles Stanley whose program I often listened to on the way to work).
I suppose I’d better end here for today and pick up again tomorrow or early next week. We’re finally at the point in history where Aileen and I went to the church that would really form us in interesting ways and lead to this blog. (Read Part Three)

I am a follower of Jesus Christ, a husband to Aileen and a father to three young children. I worship and serve as a pastor at
Releasing on April 1, The Next
Comments (29)
I’m confused. I’ve read part 1 and 2 and I still don’t understand why she threatened you when you first got to school. She said that if you ever tell anyone she’ll kill you….what was she talking about???
Tim,
Thanks for taking the time to write this narrative. It’s great to hear about each other’s walks. I’m looking forward to the next one!
Neal, I’m guessing he’s still under the threat of death! ;)
Waiting for tomorrow’s installment.
Tim,
I appreciate the story. As another commenter said, it’s nice to hear of the Lord’s work in another’s life.
One “quibble” - don’t you think, in some real sense you DID leave Reformed theology behind, if what we mean by “Reformed theology” is the theology of God, human heart, the work of Christ, and the doctrine of the Church - all of which held great importance to the first and second generation Reformers? I suppose we could call the Anabaptists “Reformers” but we usually call them “Radical Reformers” (a name I don’t think they’d quibble with, due to their doctrines that were peculiar to them…).
I’m not a huge fan of R. Scott Clark of Westminster Seminary, but I do think he has a valid point when he attempts to argue (in multiple places) that the name “Reformed” means more than just the doctrines of grace.
If Calvin or the delegates to Dordt or the Westminster Divines… or even “Old Princeton” were to walk into our “Reformed” churches today, would they really understand them to be the same, fundamentally, as theirs? I’m thinking of a Sovereign Grace, Acts 29, etc. congregation?
Doesn’t mean that RSC is more biblical… but the word did have a particular meaning at a particular time and it’s strange to see so many “Young, Restless, and Reformed” who could have very non-Reformed views of salvation (4 pointers), the covenants (progressive dispys), the Church (presbyterian-connectional), the sacraments (denying infants baptism Westminster calls a “great sin”), the ministry (two office, not three as specified in Reformed church orders), how and why worship should be ordered the way it is, legitimacy of continuing revelation, not to mention a more subtle but pernicious fascination with image and celebrity (and entertainment - see Postman) that appears in some (not all) “Reformed” churches and assumes - almost without thinking - that size of ministry is the principle indicator of faithfulness, no matter what DA Carson writes about his dad! ;-)
What are your thoughts?
The Lord bless and keep you.
Thanks for sharing!
Tim, why did your future wife threaten you on that first day at school? Did I miss something?
(thanks for a great story so far!)
I’m with the others … why did your future wife threaten you when you first met?
I’m curious about the murder threat as well. But I suppose if Tim told us what it was about Aileen would have to kill him :-(
Seriously, thanks Tim for sharing the story of God’s grace in your life.
Blessings,
R
Thanks for sharing Tim!
I’m wondering the same thing.
Maybe, to save Tim’s life and satisfy our curiosity all at the same time, Aileen could stop by and tell us!
Ah Tim - I was correct in picking you as a recalcitrant exDRC who stumbled over baptism. Me too. We are few and far between and are not considered truly reformed anymore… who cares… Now you’ve opened a can of worms which will never be able to be put back in again.
I feel like I’ve missed the pivotal scene in the movie that the detective references when he fingers the murderer - I know who did it but I don’t know how or why or when!
Tell us more Tim!
There’s one thing I need to point out here. When we left the Dutch Reformed churches, we believed that we were leaving behind our Reformed faith. I had heard the term “Reformed Baptist” but thought it a contradiction in terms. As we left those Reformed churches we were deliberately leaving behind that Reformed heritage, hoping to find a church that would have good theology but, more importantly (at least in our minds) a desire to evangelize, to take the gospel into the surrounding communities. We had never been part of a church that emphasized evangelism or really seemed to understand its importance; in all the years I was in these churches, Aileen was, quite literally, the only adult I ever saw baptized—the only adult anyone ever saw baptized. There was lots of internal growth but non-existent conversion growth. And this was very disappointing to me. I longed for a church that would be faithful in evangelism and I became convinced that this could only happen outside the context of Reformed theology.
As a former baptist and now convinced padeo baptist involved with a sister Church of the denomination that you are talking, I have to bow my head and weep at that statement because of how true it reflects my impressions of the demonination as a whole. That being said, there are many encouraging ”underground” movements in the denomination that are working their way slowly in the denomination, but while they officially have denounced presumptional regeneration, the average person in the pew has been catechised with that understanding of the Gospel.
I could stop by and tell people why the first words I ever spoke to my husband-to-be was to threaten his life…. But what would be the fun in that? I think I’ll just leave you all wondering. (but I will say the mystery is far more fun than the actual reason!
Aileen.
Boo Aileen! :-)
Aileen the prankster was caught out by Tim after doing something really silly in the classroom. Writing on the blackboard, turning chairs to face the wrong direction, planting something in someone’s desktop…. the plot thickens.
So…I had no idea that you shot Aileen down twice…glad she kept persisting! :)
One "quibble" - don't you think, in some real sense you DID leave Reformed theology behind, if what we mean by "Reformed theology" is the theology of God, human heart, the work of Christ, and the doctrine of the Church - all of which held great importance to the first and second generation Reformers? I suppose we could call the Anabaptists "Reformers" but we usually call them "Radical Reformers" (a name I don't think they'd quibble with, due to their doctrines that were peculiar to them...).
That’s fair, in a sense. I think the word Reformed has changed in meaning over the past few years. We can hold on to its traditional meaning or just go with the new one. I think at this point it’s been thoroughly co-opted, so the more traditional Reformed folk will end up needing to find a new descriptor. That’s just the way language goes. But I do agree—I’m no longer Reformed according to a traditional definition.
As for all those wondering about what caused Aileen to threaten my life, well, the story isn’t nearly as good as the punchline, so we’ll just leave it be. Honest. If I told you, you’d be disappointed. Whatever you’ve conjured up in your mind is way better than the truth. :)
Ha! I forgot that I said it was your girl friend calling!:) Wow…and to think that before you guys even met or perhaps soon after, I was helping wash her grandfather’s hair at the nursing home where I volunteered and getting to know him. Oh, and Aileen’s mom was my girl guide’s instructor before you guys ever met. Ya, I think I made you and Aileen happen!!!!!;) Or maybe her family just liked me so much that they forced her to persist!;)lol
Anyways, this is good reading!
I suddenly have a much greater appreciation for Chapter 1 of Jonathan Edward’s “Religious Affections”. His attention to defining terms is an example that we all would do well to emulate.
Having said that I must say that I felt somewhat betrayed to see that a blogger whose blog has the subtitle “Informing the Reforming” post a blog subtitled “How and Why I Rejected Reformed Theology”.
Then again, I guess the question here is why do folks who are essentially Baptists in both theology and polity insist on calling themselves “Reformed”? Secondly, why are we who are Reformed so desperate to have others agree with us that we would allow them to hijack a descriptor when it clearly does not define them?
I live in a very rural area of the United States. I came to an understanding of the Doctrines of Grace through reading the Scriptures and through the Power of the Holy Spirit. Literally, in the first months after my conversion, I knew NO one who believed like I did except for the Puritans (and they were all dead). I can so relate to many of the points of your post. My husband and I found a Reformed church that was around an hour from our home. While doctrinally solid, there did not seem to be an emphasis on a personal, vibrant relationship with Christ and very little interest in evangelizing the community. We currently travel to a Reformed Baptist church that is two hours from our home where the teaching is solid, the corporate worship is joyful, and the congregation lives in daily humble dependence on the grace of God. We pray to be part of a church body that is closer to home, but so far have not found a local church where the doctrine is solid AND the congregation individually, consciously, and corporately lives in a dependent ongoing relationship with Christ. I want to be in a body where people realize their desperate need for Christ every second of every day. This life is not the time to be asleep and comfortable just because one knows theological truth.
“I think at this point it’s been thoroughly co-opted, so the more traditional Reformed folk will end up needing to find a new descriptor.”
I’m curious, using that same logic -when a Mormon wants to call themselves a Christian we who are truly Christian should be OK with it then?
I’m kind of glad you’re not telling us the WHY behind Aileen’s murder threat. It’s like the “noodle incident” in Calvin and Hobbes … way more interesting in our imaginations.
Comparing Tim’s writing to that of Calvin and Hobbes is the highest of praise in my book.
“‘I’m not a huge fan of R. Scott Clark of Westminster Seminary…”This comment was so not beneficial at all.
I understand why those who are “truly reformed” (I am being genuine) would want to guard their tradition. I also empathize with Tim in that it is a bit cumbersome to qualify “I’m really more soteriologically reformed, not reformed in the traditional sense. Let me explain….”
On a side note I also identify with part 1 of the story where God used the imperfect means of Christian metal to birth spiritual growth. Petra was slightly before my time, but these posts of the past made me write a quick ode of thanks to P.O.D. for the unsuspected way God has used them in my early Christian walk.
Thanks for sharing the personal testimony Tim!
Somebody’s gonna have to catch me up on where the word “Reformed” really came from. I thought that it simply reflected that one’s doctrine derives from the recovery of the Gospel during the Reformation period in the 16th Century, which I’m sure spills over into the sacraments/ordinances, but I would not think quite to the level of “sola fide”, the doctrine of justification by faith alone in Christ alone. Cannot Baptists hold to the solas just the same as the “capital R” Reformed? Don’t organizations such as the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals and the Gospel Coalition, comprised of leaders from several different backgrounds, reflect Christian unity in the core doctrines of the Gospel? I know that “Reformed” has been overused of late, but I’d really like to know its origins from anyone who knows other than what I’ve said. Just trying to learn a thing or two here.
BTW, I love this story!