Download: Audio File  |
This week's Connected Kingdom podcast discusses with seminary, whether it is good and necessary and wise and all the rest. You won’t be surprised to learn that David Murray does the bulk of the speaking! You've got two options: You can read the transcript below or you can listen in by clicking on the audio player. If you listen in, you'll be able to hear the two of us interact a little bit.
I have a hate-love relationship with Seminary.
When I was converted in my early twenties, and sensed an almost immediate sense of call to the ministry, I was looking at six years of training before I got near a congregation. (I'd gone straight from High School into Finance, because, I mean, who needs a degree to make a million dollars? Right!)
Six years? Three years at University, then three at Seminary? The world needs me, the Church needs me, lost souls need me! Why do I need books, lectures, professors, etc?
I was ready to jump on to MV Logos and save the world. Yet, despite trying hard to find someone to confirm my vital stop-the-clock mission, every voice, without exception, told me to get some education and some theological training first.
So with much reluctance and considerable resistance, I started the long, weary six-year plod through Glasgow University, then Seminary in Edinburgh.
Glasgow University taught me how to learn, and Seminary taught me what I needed to learn. At least, that was the theory. I'm afraid my Seminary years were a fairly miserable experience. Some of that was my own fault; but most of it wasn't.
This is not the place to enter into the details, but suffice to say that the Seminary's Faculty and the student body were angrily divided and fatally distracted by a major theological and moral controversy that eventually split our Presbyterian denomination. For that, and for other reasons, it was hardly the best place to learn or to prepare for ministry. I lost 24lbs going through Seminary (most people go the other way) because of the stress!
I'm telling you all this because I want to demonstrate that my current appreciation for Seminaries and their role in preparing men for ministry has been despite my own prejudices before Seminary and and my painful experiences in it. I've been won over through experience in the ministry and by seeing how wonderful places Seminaries can potentially be.
But one other detour before I get to that...After our Presbyterian denomination split, my own side of that divide were left without a Seminary or a Professor. After trying a few options, we eventually decided to start our own distance-learning Seminary.
As we couldn't afford to hire full-time professors, we asked five pastors to add teaching duties to their pastoral work and to teach our handful of students using mainly distance education methods. The idea was that our students would stay in their own home congregations, receive lectures to read and listen to, and then come together for a couple of days a month for face-to-face instruction with the five pastor-lecturers.
I was a real enthusiast for this "hybrid" approach as I thought it would avoid some of the dangers and difficulties of the residential seminary method that I suffered.
On the whole it worked very well. The part-time lecturers did an amazing job of producing quality lectures on top of their pastoral work. At times it was frustrating for the teachers to have so little face-time with the students. Seminary training is much more than data-transfer. Ethos and pathos are as important as logos and you can't communicate that without personal presence.
Some students found it very hard to motivate themselves without the daily discipline of lectures and seminars. The few face-to-face days were great, but they also reminded the students of how lonely the in-between weeks were. Some students were well-supported in their home congregations; others, however, had very little local interest or input.
And now I've come full circle. I started out hating Seminary before I even got there. I grew to hate it even more through my experience of training in one. I saw the potential of a healthy Seminary, though in a hybrid model, and now I'm teaching in a residential Seminary and I love it.
Although there can be significant disadvantages, and although it does not fit every student or church situation, on the whole I believe a good Seminary is a great way to prepare for a lifetime of ministry.
I'm not saying it's the only way - we all know men, past and present, who've had faithful and fruitful ministries without Seminary training. And I'm definitely not supporting Seminary training divorced from the local church - that's a disaster area. However I do believe in a significant role for Seminaries in training men for the ministry. Even where a large part of a man's training is in a local church, I would strongly encourage the integration of well-taught Seminary courses, or even a short period of residential study in a Seminary.
Some of the benefits of a Seminary education are:
However, I know all too well that there are disadvantages, and I highlight them here, not as deal-breakers but as areas that require extra thought and care if we are to avoid Seminaries becoming a hindrance rather than a help:
Seminary is not a "Finishing School" for pastors. It's more like a starting school. It sets you up for a lifetime of learning. In fact, if all Seminary teaches you is how much you have to learn - it might be worth it just for that.
If you choose to listen to the audio recording, you will hear David and me interact a little bit.
If you'd like to give us feedback or join in the discussion, go ahead and look up our Facebook Group  or leave a comment right here. You will always be able to find the most recent episode here on the blog. If you would like to subscribe via iTunes, you can do that here  or if you want to subscribe with another audio player, you can try this RSS link .