Reading Classics Together - Redemption Accomplished and Applied (VI)

We continue today with our readings in John Murray’s classic book Redemption Accomplished and Applied. Having made our way through the first section with discusses the accomplishment of the atonement, we have now turned to the second part, which discusses its application to the elect. Last week we read the introduction to this section where Murray defended the order of the various acts that together comprise the atonement. This week he turns to effectual calling, the first of these.

Discussion
The first act of God as he saves a people for himself is the effectual call. Murray first distinguishes between a general call (or non-effectual call) and an effectual call, saying “the overtures of grace in the gospel addressed to all men without distinction are very real and we must maintain that doctrine with all its implications for God’s grace, on the one hand, and for man’s responsibility and privilege, on the other.” Though many are called, few are chosen. Though God’s call to all men to repent is sincere, it is not effectual unless he makes it so.

Murray covers the topic under several headings: the author, the nature, the pattern and the priority.

The Author. Here he shows that God is the author of this effectual call. “Calling is an act of God’s grace and power just as regeneration, justification and adoption are.” No man can call himself out of darkness and into light; it requires an act of God’s sovereign grace. “We may not like this doctrine,” he says, “But, if so, it is because we are averse to the grace of God and wish to arrogate to ourselves the prerogative that belongs to God. And we know where that disposition had its origin.” He takes time to point out that it is the Father specifically who is the agent of the effectual call. “He comes into the most intimate relation to his people in the application of redemption by being the specific and particular actor in the inception of such application.”

The Nature. Murray wants to be sure that we properly understand the strength of the word “call.” It is a word that has more power in the Greek than in its English translation. “If we are to understand the strength of this word, as used in this connection, we must use the word ‘summons.’ The action by which God makes his people the partakers of redemption is that of summons. And since it is God’s summons it is efficacious summons.” We may be summoned to appear in court and, even with the authorities threatening punishment if we fail to appear, we can still ultimately decide not to. But when God summons we are unable and unwilling to resist. “The summons is invested with the efficacy by which we are delivered to the destination intended—we are effectively ushered into the fellowship of Christ.” Showing that this is calling into the kingdom of Christ and out of the kingdom of darkness, Murray offers this important warning: “If we find ourselves at home in the ungodliness, lust, and filth of this present world, it is because we have not been called effectually by God’s grace.

The Pattern. “When we do something with intelligence and wisdom we do it with design and according to plan. … How preeminently true this is of God himself. Execution with God is the perfect fulfillment of the designed plan.” Murray then uses this section to point out three of the features of this pattern. First, it is a pattern of determinate purpose. God’s calling is not haphazard or sudden, but has occupied him since time eternal. Second, God’s call is eternal and thus beyond our ability to comprehend. Third, the pattern is devised in Christ so that it cannot be understood apart from him. We must see each member of the godhead as involved in this effectual call. “We have here an index to the perfect harmony and conjunction of the persons of the godhead in those operations which are embraced in the economy of salvation. It is coordination that goes back to the fountainhead of salvation.”

The Priority. Here Murray defends effectual calling as an act that takes place prior to regeneration. Although he admits that no great doctrine is lost if we reverse this order, still he believes that this is the most logical and biblical progression. After offering four points in defense he concludes, “There is good warrant for the conclusion that the application of redemption begins with the sovereign and efficacious summons by which the people of God are ushered into the fellowship of Christ and union with him to the end that they may become partakers of all the grace and virtue which reside in him as Redeemer, Savior, and Lord.”

I really enjoyed this chapter, admiring Murray’s ability to pack so much solid, biblical content into so short a chapter. I look forward to continuing through the book.

Next Week
For next Thursday please read the next chapter—“Regeneration.”

Your Turn
The purpose of this program is to read classics together. So if there are things that stood out to you in this chapter, if there are questions you had, this is the time and place to have your say. Feel free to post a comment below or to link to your blog if you’ve chosen to write about this on your own site.

Comments (8)

1
Anonymous's picture

My summary of this chapter.

I’ve always thought of calling and regeneration as so closely related that they might be two aspects of the same thing. Kind of like repentance and faith. I’m not sure if I’m alone in this, or not.

2
Anonymous's picture

Rebecca,

I’m not sure if I have ever thought of what you are saying about effectual calling and regeneration, but that does seem to make a lot of sense.

For instance, when Jesus called the disciples from fishing, they obeyed and came immediately. Just as you cannot have true faith without true repentance, you cannot have true regeneration without effectual calling, and vice versa. I think an example of this is Jesus’ words in John 10:27 “My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me.” Jesus voice is the effectual calling, and the fact that His sheep follow is the evidence of regeneration.

3
Anonymous's picture

I really enjoyed this chapter, admiring Murray’s ability to pack so much solid, biblical content into so short a chapter.”

That is precisely why I really enjoy Murray. Precision with little fanfare; just solid writing.

Here is my very brief summary: http://quercuscalliprinos.blogspot.com/2009/12/reading-classics-with-challies_17.html

Jude

4
Anonymous's picture

Very frustrated.I started to fall behind with the onset of so many extra pastoral duties for the Advent-Christmas season. Kinda, wish you had taken a break until after the new year. This is such a great and important book. The encouragement to read it together is a wonderful experience,

Floyd

5
Anonymous's picture

I liked the emphasis on the powerful nature of the call of God. My summary and comment can be found here:http://reformedbookclub.blogspot.com/2009/12/redemption-accomplished-and-applied_18.html

Also Rebecca, for what it’s worth I do think calling is before regeneration. If we understand regeneration as a response (which Murray suggests), then it has to be before the call. You couldn’t have a call and response at the same time - it would be bad communication :)

6
Anonymous's picture

If we understand regeneration as a response

I’d think regeneration is a work of the Holy Spirit. I do think that calling comes first in this sense: In the same way that God created by calling light out of darkness, he recreates us by calling us from darkness into light.

7
Anonymous's picture

Calling is an act of God and of God alone. This fact should make us keenly aware how dependent we are upon the sovereign grace of God in the application of redemption.”

I’ve never intentionally broken out before all the segments of the application of redemption like Murray is doing, so each chapter is a little new to me.

Until recently, I’ve not even thought much about the difference between the universal call to all men, and an “effectual call.” I’m not sure how it affects my overall theology, but it definitely is tweaking it in some needed places.

8
Anonymous's picture

For the last few years God has been teaching me so much about the salvation He gave me. I grew up believing that I had to choose to become a Christian. It’s very easy to become prideful in thinking that at least I had sense enough to choose Jesus. Murray reminds me that God called me. I didn’t call myself. I love how God’s sovereignty is seen in every aspect of salvation.