Reading Classics Together - Redemption Accomplished and Applied (VIII)

Today we continue our readings in John Murray’s classic book Redemption Accomplished and Applied. We are in the second section of the book which deals with the application of the atonement to God’s elect. We’ve looked at effectual calling and regeneration and turn now to faith and repentance.

Summary
Regeneration, which we looked at last week, is inseparable from its effects, one of which is faith. “Without regeneration,” says Murray, “it is morally and spiritually impossible for a person to believe in Christ, but when a person is regenerated it is morally and spiritually impossible for that person not to believe.” Regeneration is God’s renewing of the heart and mind and, once renewed, the heart and mind must act in accordance with their new nature.

Looking first to faith Murray examines both the warrant and nature of faith which he defines as “a whole-souled movement of self-commitment to Christ for salvation from sin and its consequences.”

He offers two facts which together constitute the warrant of faith. The first of these is the universal offer of the gospel. This charge is “invested with the authority and majesty of his sovereignty as Lord of all. The sovereign imperative of God is brought to bear upon the overture of grace. And that is the end of all contention.” The second is the all-sufficiency and suitability of the Savior presented. On the basis of his person and work, Christ is the suitable and sufficient Savior. Murray pauses to point out some crucial correctives about the faith he is discussing. “The faith of which we are now speaking is not the belief that we have been saved but trust in Christ in order that we may be saved. … It is not as persons convinced of our election nor as persons convinced that we are the special objects of God’s love that we commit ourselves to him but as lost sinners. We entrust ourselves to him not because we believe we have been saved but as lost sinners in order that we may be saved.”

He turns next to the nature of the gospel, pointing out that there are three things that need to be said about faith: that it is knowledge, conviction and trust. Faith cannot be a vacuum of knowledge (as many try to present it). Instead, there must be a certain knowledge of facts. But, of course, facts are not enough; there must also be conviction about these facts. And third, there must be trust. “Faith cannot stop short of self-commitment to Christ, a transference of reliance upon ourselves and all human resources to reliance upon Christ alone for salvation.” He says also, “Faith … is not belief of propositions of truth respecting the Savior, however essential an ingredient of faith such belief is. Faith is trust in a person, the person of Christ, the Son of God and Savior of the lost. It is entrustment of ourselves to him. It is not simply believing him; it is believing in him and on him.”

Murray turns next to repentance. He shows that there is no real priority in order between faith and repentance for “the faith that is unto salvation is a penitent faith and the repentance that is unto life is a believing repentance.” The essence of repentance is a change of heart and mind and will. This change principally respects four things: “a change of mind respecting God, respecting ourselves, respecting sin, and respecting righteousness.” It is a radical change that strikes to the very core of who we are and what we believe about all of life. “The test of repentance,” says Murray, “is the genuineness and resoluteness of our repentance in respect of our own sins, sins characterized by the aggravations which are peculiar to our own selves.” He concludes this section with pointing the reader to the cross: “It is at the cross of Christ that repentance has its beginning; it is at the cross of Christ that it must continue to pour out its heart in the tears of confession and contrition. The way of sanctification is the way of contrition for the sin of the past and of the present. The Lord forgives our sins and forgiveness is sealed by the light of his countenance, but we do not forgive ourselves.”

Next Week
For next Thursday please read the next chapter—“Justification.”

Your Turn
The purpose of this program is to read classics together. So if there are things that stood out to you in this chapter, if there are questions you had, this is the time and place to have your say. Feel free to post a comment below or to link to your blog if you’ve chosen to write about this on your own site.

Comments (7)

1
Anonymous's picture

Just got a copy of the book so looking forward to joining in now!

2
Anonymous's picture

Douglas, welcome to the journey.

Here is the opening paragraph of my post: Wayne Grudem defines conversion as a willing response to the gospel call, in which we sincerely repent of sins and place our trust in Christ for salvation. By that definition one can see that true conversion includes both repentance and faith; one repents of sin and trusts in Christ.

Murray does an excellent job of defining and clarifying the joined concepts of faith and repentance. I really enjoyed this chapter. Having just read 2 Piper books on justification, I’m really looking forward to this next chapter.

The rest of my post can be seen here: http://quercuscalliprinos.blogspot.com/2009/12/reading-classics-with-challies_31.html

Happy New Year everyone.

3
Anonymous's picture

My summary of this chapter is here.

I have a feeling there may be specific historical controversies that played into at least one of the points Murray made in this chapter. I’m going to try to look that up this week if I get time

4
Anonymous's picture

I thought Murray summed it up best at the beginning:”God alone regenerates. We alone believe.”

The rest of the chapter supported those statements.

I appreciated his pointing out that the universal offer also existed in the Old Testament. Sometimes that goes overlooked, but it’s there.

I also liked this point, which he’s made in a previous chapter:”It is not the possibility of salvation that is offered to lost men but the Saviour himself…” I think many get those two confused. The distinction may seem small at first glance, but the former could seem impersonal whereas the latter is where relationship dwells fully. It’s the perfect match of what we need with what He is.

5
Anonymous's picture

My summary and thoughts are found here: http://reformedbookclub.blogspot.com/2010/01/redemption-accomplished-and-applied.html

I liked Murray telling us that repentance involves condemning your own sins, not simply a condemnation of sin in general. You need to turn the blowtorch on yourself.

6
Anonymous's picture

I have a question concerning this book. Although Murray’s discription of Salvation is my understanding.I was told recently by another Reformed Christian whom I respect, who says that Dr. Murray’s view on this subject, is not the view held by the Reformers, in fact it is a relatively new view made popular by Dr. Murray.He went on to say that until Dr. Murray made this popular, what he called “the elongated view” was held by Reformed believers.

Does anyone know anything about this particular issue that might be helpful?

7
Anonymous's picture

I like the point Murray made that it is a fallacy “to think of faith in terms simply of decision and rather cheap decision at that.” I think that is a foundation of the easy believism that exists rin many evangelical churches today. Repentance is too often ignored.