- RSS FeedSubscribe
- « Previous PostA La Carte (06/14)
- Next Post »A La Carte (06/15)
Evangelism & The Sovereignty of God
- 06/14/06
- 58
There has been a good bit of talk in the blogosphere over the past couple of weeks about the election of a new President of the Southern Baptist Convention. As you no-doubt know, there are many who have been seeking to build bridges between the Calvinist and Arminian factions within the Convention. Monday’s “debate” between Paige Patterson and Al Mohler was an indication of the willingness of men on both sides of the divide to affirm their mutual respect and admiration.
As is so often the case, much of the discussion between the two factions deals with the subject of evangelism. It is a common charge levelled against Calvinists that Reformed doctrine somehow reduces the desire to share the gospel with the lost. Whether fairly or unfairly, Calvinists are notorious for their lack of evangelism.
This is not a fair charge and I believe that, in many ways, Arminian churches can be every bit as lax in their efforts to evangelize. I would go so far as to say that millions of Americans, sitting in Evangelical churches week after week, have never been evangelized. The reason for this is that too many believers do not understand the difference between outreach and evangelism. Efforts have been made to reach out to unbelievers and they may even have been drawn in to a church, but without ever hearing the gospel message.
Every Christian should agree on the necessity of reaching out to the world with the Good News of Jesus Christ. Through history some Christians and some groups of Christians have placed more emphasis on this than others, but nearly all have agreed on its importance. In the English language we have two terms that are often used synonymously to describe the sharing of the Good News - evangelism and outreach. In this article I would like to address the difference between outreach and evangelism, for I believe we often confuse the terms. We often feel that we have fulfilled the Lord’s command to preach the gospel through evangelism, when in reality we have been involved in outreach. While both are noble pursuits and can bring honor to God, it is evangelism that best fulfills His command to take the Good News to all the world.
Evangelism
e-van-gel ( -v n j l)
n.
1. The Christian gospel.
2. An evangelist.
[Middle English evaungel, from Late Latin vangelium, from Greek euangelion, good news, from euangelos, bringing good news : eu-, eu- + angelos, messenger.]
The root of the word evangelism, evangel, is derived from the Greek word euangelion which is translated good news. From that same word, we derive the word gospel. We find also that many words we use in English are in reality synonymous - evangel(ism), gospel and good news all speak of the same thing and find their root in the same word. They speak of the act of spreading the gospel and to the content of the message that is given. This is an important point to note - they refer both to the method and the message.
The word euangelion is found in many places throughout the New Testament. “The term is often used to express collectively the gospel doctrines; and ‘preaching the gospel’ is often used to include not only the proclaiming of the good tidings, but the teaching men how to avail themselves of the offer of salvation, the declaring of all the truths, precepts, promises, and threatenings of Christianity.” It is termed “the gospel of the grace of God” (Acts 20:24), “the gospel of the kingdom” (Matt. 4:23), “the gospel of Christ” (Rom. 1:16), “the gospel of peace (Eph. 6:15), “the glorious gospel,” “the everlasting gospel,” “the gospel of salvation” (Eph. 1:13).” (Easton Illustrated Dictionary)
In the Elwell Evangelical Dictionary we read specifically about Paul’s application of the term which he used over 60 times and is found in every one of his letters except for Titus. “Paul’s ministry was distinctively that of the propagation of the gospel. Unto this gospel he was set apart (Rom. 1:1) and made a minister according to the grace of God (Eph. 3:7). His special sphere of action was the Gentile world (Rom. 16:16; Gal. 2:7). Since Paul accepted the gospel as a sacred trust (Gal. 2:7), it was necessary that in the discharge of this obligation he speak so as to please God rather than man (I Tim. 2:4). The divine commission had created a sense of urgency that made him cry out, “Woe to me if I do not preach the gospel” (I Cor. 9:16). For the sake of the gospel Paul was willing to become all things to all men (I Cor. 9:22-23). No sacrifice was too great. Eternal issues were at stake. Those whose minds were blinded and did not obey the gospel were perishing and would ultimately reap the vengeance of divine wrath (II Cor. 4:3; II Thess. 1:9). On the other hand, to those who believed, the gospel had effectively become the power of God unto salvation (Rom. 1:16).”
We can find insight into what the gospel means to Christians through the words of William Tyndale, who was a great English Reformer and Bible translator. To him it signified “good, mery, glad and ioyfull tydinge, that maketh a mannes hert glad, and maketh hym synge, daunce, and leepe for ioye.” It truly is Good News!
Evangelism is more than telling people that Jesus loves them or that He died for them. It is telling people that they have offended a Holy God and stand before Him as condemned sinners. It is sharing with them that the good news, the best news of all, is that Jesus died for that very type of person. Jesus died to reconcile those condemned individuals to this God of justice. It is sharing with people that through faith they can be saved and can avoid an eternity of suffering for their offense to God. The Good News can only be understood in context of the bad news. If people do not understand the bad, if they do not realize that they are repugnant to God, befouled by their sin, they can not understand just how good the Good News is!
Outreach
Unlike evangel, the term outreach is not found in the Bible, though the idea certainly is. Outreach implies action more than message. Perhaps it is best defined as a business term: “an act of reaching out, bringing an organization’s services or products out into the community.” When a church engages in outreach, it is reaching out to the community in order to meet needs or to let people know of its existence. The Salvation Army is an excellent example. When tragedy strikes, especially in the case of natural disasters, the Salvation Army is often on the scene, providing food, clothing and other necessities. The Southern Baptist Convention does much the same as we saw in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Local churches in my hometown have some excellent outreach programs. For example, every year our town has a festival in a park down on the shores of Lake Ontario and one church brings in a climbing wall and allows all the children to scale the wall for no cost. This is an act of love by the church and allows people to make a connection with the church - a connection they hope will eventually draw people into fellowship. They see this as a selfless act and an act of grace as they give people something for nothing. So often people are shocked that a church would do this, for this activity usually represents the only activity in the entire festival that costs nothing. And so the church reaches out to people to give them an opportunity to see Christians in action and to learn about the church.
This is outreach. Unbelievers are given a glimpse of the love of Christ through believers. Believers take their love for the lost into the community and allow them to see changed hearts in action. There is usually nothing offensive about outreach, and it is often regarded as noble, even by those who are opposed to Christ.
The Great Commission
Jesus’ final words to His disciples, the foundation upon which His church would be built, were “Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” This “Great Commission” was given by our Lord to direct the actions of His church from the moment of its birth until He comes again to bring it to Himself. Jesus’ words imply not outreach, but evangelism. We are to go to all nations and share this awe-inspiring message with people of every nation, race and creed. We are to share the full truth of the gospel. Needless to say, we can only share such news with our words. Our actions are important and should not be under-emphasized, but people are not saved by actions - they are saved by this message which holds the power to convict men’s hearts.
1 Corinthians 1:21 tells us “it pleased God through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe.” This speaks both of the method, which is preaching, and the message, which is the Gospel. When we share the Gospel, then, we share a message that is offensive to the natural human mind. No human likes to be told that he has offended God and stands before Him as a condemned man. No human, in and of himself, would humble himself before this God and seek repentance. It is only through the power of God through the message of the Gospel that people can be saved, for God has ordained that He will work through this message to save His people. God uses this seemingly foolish and offensive message to reach people’s hearts and turn them to Him.
When we evangelize, we share this message in all its offense, for in the offense of the Gospel there is power! When we remove the offense, we remove the power.
Outreach vs. Evangelism
There is clearly a significant difference between outreach and evangelism. They are both noble actions and bring honor to God. It is important to realize, and this should be clear through the descriptions, that they are not synonymous. The greatest difference is that evangelism is primarily a message while outreach is primarily an action.
We should note that there may be an important link between outreach and evangelism. Often times we reach out to people to draw them into a place where we can evangelize to them. We may provide children with an opportunity to have fun so that we can invite their parents to come to our church where we will take the opportunity to share the Good News with them. It is the hope of any believer that his actions will cause others to realize he is somehow different and convict that person so he can ask what makes the believer different.
Conclusion
It is important that we do not confuse outreach with evangelism. Jesus gave His church, the body that He valued so highly He gave His life for it, a commission to go to the world and share the Good News of what He did. Every believer is responsible before God to do this - we are to tell others of their condition and to share with them God’s remedy. This can only be done through evangelism, through sharing the evangel which God uses to draw His people to Himself.
Don Whitney likens the evangelist to a mailman. The mailman has fulfilled the obligation of his job when he has delivered the mail to me. The measure of success in his job is to carefully and accurately deliver the message. How I respond to the letters I receive is none of his business. And the same is true of the evangelist. We have successfully evangelized when we have shared the Gospel. When we have carefully and accurately delivered the message of God, we can trust that we have pleased our Father. The message is delivered not through outreach, but through evangelism. It is simple enough to attract people to a message through outreach, and we can gather a large group of people through simple outreach, but we may not have evangelized them, even if they fill the pews of our churches.
Do you wish to fulfill our Lord’s great commission? Then go boldly, sharing this foolish, offensive gospel message, knowing that it carries in it the very power of God. Trust and believe that in so doing you are bringing honor to our Lord and Savior and doing your part to build His Kingdom. Reach out to the lost, but ensure that you always leave them with the message of the gospel. Actions may draw them, but words are necessary to convey the message through which God saves His people.

I am a follower of Jesus Christ, a husband to Aileen and a father to three young children. I worship and serve as a pastor at
Releasing on April 1, The Next
Comments (58)
To Emmett, Don, debtor2grace, and others…let me first say that I have been asked quite a number of questions here as a result of my statements that there is no such thing as a real, meaningful, deep relationship outside of the common bond of Christ. Before I answer some of the questions posed by Emmett and debtor2grace, I would like to again ask the question that no one seems to be willing to answer, which is this: IF you (being a believer) have a relationship with an unbeliever, ON WHAT is that relationship based? What is the foundation that holds that relationship together?
Now, with as little rhetoric and emotion as possible, I will attempt to answer some of the questions put to me.
Let me say from the beginning that I think many are confusing acquaintance and surface-level association with relationship and fellowship.
Emmett’s questions:How are you leading people to Jesus Christ in a way that completely avoids the hundreds of people that you develop relationships with in your business?
A - First of all, I have not developed any relationships within the course of conducting my business that are outside of Christ. However, I do have many aquiantances that have come about as a result of the business. But I do not consider them relationships, nor do I consider to be in fellowship with these people. The relationships that HAVE developed as a result of the business have come about due to a common faith in the one true Savior.
This [business] sounds like an absolutely wonderful means to contact people and begin leading them toward Jesus Christ - I’ve always had that picture in my mind when I read your website. I cannot think of any better way to meet prospects and contacts that operating a “meet the public”, families and fun, mom, dad and the kids service business like yours - wonderful!
How could that not be an open door to talk to people…
A - We operate our business unashamedly to the glory of God, never shying away from giving Him all the honor and credit for what He has done in our lives with this business. We are always ready to give a defense…a reason for the hope that is in us. But, we do not operate the business to be used as an evangelistic tool, or a means to contact people. In fact, we are SO open about the fact that we belong to Chrirst that there are probably many who do NOT call on us for our services because of that very reason. So, should I perhaps NOT be so open about my faith, so that more who are not saved might employ our services, thereby providing me with a platform to witness to them? I don’t think so.
in what other manner do you reach these folks? How do you “proclaim Christ” in isolation from these folks? And why do you characterize this all this as a “false relationship”?
A - Look…we (my wife and I) are not overtly on the offense in relation to evangelism - obviously, we are also NOT living secret Christian lives, for we openly name the name of Christ in all that we do. Quite frankly, neither I nor my wife have the gift of evangelism. My main gifts are teaching and discernment, which are geared toward those who already have faith in Christ. Pam is gifted in the areas of serving and ministering to children (she is an incredible storyteller). Does this mean I don’t have conviction to share my faith in a more agressive manner, no…I have been convicted more and more about that lately.
I just don’t see any benefit (or Scriptural precept) for investing time into building “relationships” with unbelievers. I certainly don’t see it as a pre-requisite for sharing the gospel to someone. In fact, I see just the opposite precept in Scripture regarding trying to have fellowship with those who walk in darkness.
debtor2grace asked:How do you reconcile the attitude that all relationships w/ non-believers are not real and not meaningful w/ your day to day business and life?
A - Again, I think there is some misunderstanding over what a true relationship involves (fellowship), and what a mere aquaintance or surface-level association with someone is. Any business dealing with non-believers are just that…business dealings. Now, when they deal with us they will see - to the best of our ability and to the extent God has granted to us - our faith and even hear us talk about Christ in all that we do. But, we have no fellowship among those we do business with who do not share the common faith that we have in Christ…NO ONE else does either, or even can, no matter what people on this comment thread or elsewhere may say.
This is where I think we have seen a lot of emotional rhetoric concerning a hot button topic. It sounds mean when I say it is impossible to have a true, deep, real relationship with an unbeliever…but guess what, if you disagree with me…don’t get mad at me, that is plain teaching from Scripture. And if you think I’m wrong, then show me from Scripture where I am wrong. I’m open to correction, honest!
Also, what about your children? They may not be believers at this moment, but isn’t your relationship w/ them real and meaningful?
debtor, this is a whole ‘nother topic! Without getting too far into this one, we have Scriptural precepts for how do deal and interact with our children…by bringing them up in the discipline and admonition of the Lord. Theology will also play a big role in this as well. For example, Presbyterians consider children under the Covenant until such time as they deny that they are, or profess faith of their own accord. I am honestly not sure how Baptists are to view their children under credo-baptistic theology…and I’m a credo-baptist!!!
Anyway, for this discussion, I would prefer to stick with those assocations with which we have control in choosing, and to that end, would like to quote Matthew Henry again on this very topic:
Those relations that are our choice must be chosen by rule; and it is good for those who are themselves the children of God to join with those who are so likewise; for there is more danger that the bad will damage the good than hope that the good will benefit the bad. 2. In common conversation. We should not yoke ourselves in friendship and acquaintance with wicked men and unbelievers. Though we cannot wholly avoid seeing, and hearing, and being with such, yet we should never choose them for our bosom-friends.
Thanks for the questions, and God bles you both. I hope I haven’t made my position even more confusing. If so, please fire away and I will try to clarify.
Also, check out my latest post on my site at voiceofthesheep for more on this.
Brian,
“ON WHAT”
With Steve, the softball player on my team, we have all the normal everyday things in common. He has a family. I have a family. He works and I work. We have a lot in common. We talk about the Lord as well.I have a lot of relationships with unbelievers, and they all vary. Some are humanists. Some are Catholics. Some are religious, and some are not. Some are better friends then others.Do we pray together in the Spirit? No. Do I pray for them? Yes. Some even ask me to pray for them.
Are my Christian friends more geuine friends? Yes and no. They are for sure more spiritual friends. But some unbelievers are close friends. The one thing we do not agree on is the gospel. They think I’m wrong. And that’s alright. But they are not offended; for what ever reason, I can not say. Others are offended, and I am not close to them, and they are not friends.
Some Christians are not friends. They are my eternal brothers and sisters, but they are actually not as close to me as some unbelievers.If this is wrong, then I pray the Lord would put me staight. But this is how it is in my life. And that’s only the tip of the iceberg.Have a wonderful Lord’s Day, worshipping the Father and His Son, Jesus Chriost. God bless.
I halfway think that “show me from the scriptures to prove me wrong” can be applied to everything from the color of the church carpet to the use of the word “Trinity”. As I read the Bible I look at the context of why something was written and to whom, etc. I made an “A” in hermeneutics :) The letters of Paul to the church often instructs beleivers on how to deal with one another. A few statements also tell believers how to relate to unebelievers as far as using discernment in these relationships. I don’t know of anyone (outside of AW Pink and John Gill…. very poor examples of relational pastors, though great theologians) who reads their Bible contexually and see that human beings were created to be relational people. Christians can have real and meaningful relationships with the lost. I see fathers and sons and mothers and daughters doing it. I’ve experienced it. As I stated, I thank God for a Chrisitan befriending me even though I cursed him and his wife and sought to destroy their faith numerous times…they bore with me and helped me along. Though they were praying for me together and I didn’t know it at that time, on the outside he found out I liked working out so he began doing the same. He found out I liked music so we began to fellowship around music. he wa salways careful to not let me pull him into sin and he was always careful to tell me the reason why he was doing anything for me and with me at all as far as friendship is concerned: to glorify God to someone who was way lost. I would have taken a bullet for them and them for me. For them it was to win me to Christ. I wasn’t a “project” to these people. They loved me and we had areal and meaningful relationship and even if I’d never have believed on Jesus (God forbid!) he would still be among my friends. This couple was careful to let me know there was a spiritual dimension that I wasn’t a part of. They were clear they enjoyed a fellowship with their fellow believers that I didn’t or couldn’t have. So I think we need to be careful before we dismiss “friendship evangelism” or whatever it’s called.
I appreciate your reply, Brian - very few of use are called as or gifted specifically to be evangelists, yet we are all commanded, as regular Christians, to witness and share the gospel with all that we can. I’m sure convicted about it. I’m glad I’m not the only one! I want to do better.
Re: the foundation of a relationship between believers and non-believers…
I’ll give it a try - I heard John MacArthur explain fellowship in the context of I John 1:3 once, and remember some of it. Fellowship isn’t primarily a theological term - it is regularly used in both classic and common Greek literature. The overarching thought is to share in common, often “to share a common life”. Thayer’s Lexicon speaks of association, community, joint participation. And so fellowship exists on multiple levels. It can be the new life we have in Christ (as in I John 1:3), which is limited to regenerate folks, but it doesn’t have to mean that, linguistically or practically. All humans share much fellowship, the having of common, creation life, saved or lost. We have societal fellowship based on living and working in the same area, and national fellowship based on having citizenship in a common country. People who like the Braves share a common part of their life (“baseball life” :) ) and are in fellowship, on that level, with folks who also love the Braves!
Obviously, most of these are pretty superficial fellowships, and have no merit in themselves, but they may help serve as bridges or connecting points when we are out living among peope with whom we hope to share the gospel, see the Lord grant them salvation, and enter into a much deeper and richer fellowship as now we and they would then both belong to Christ.
For the Christian and non-Christian, the interesting point for evangelism (as mentioned in several good posts above) is where the “worlds” of the Christian and the non-Chrisitan intersect. Now that we are Christians, we have been immediately justified in our spirit, sins forgiven, righteousness imputed, and we have no fellowship with lost folk on that level, for we do not share a common life with them spiritually (i.e. Scriptures re: Christ and Belial, above). Between us and them, there is now a great gulf fixed - which we really, really want Christ to bridge, and to bring our lost friends to salvation. Next, as Christians, we are being progressively sanctified in our souls, and our mind, emotions and wills are being conformed to the image of His Son, by the Spirit life of: prayer, study of the Word, fellowship, preaching, etc. But as a consequence of being here on earth, we do, psychologically, still face many of the same mind, emotion, and will situations as our lost neighbors. We all worry about taxes, Al Quaida and the bird flu. One key area is in our bodies - our new life in Christ has made no difference whatsoever in our physical life, at this point. One day we’ll be glorified, but now we are corrupting at exactly the same rate as our lost neighbors. We see them regularly at the doctor and dentist - we have hope for a glorified body, but they do not - but that is in the future for us both. For now, we are in fellowship as having Adamic, corrupting physical life - with its sickness, limitations and sadness - with our non-Christian neighbors and friends.
Point? We have no spiritual fellowship with our lost friends. But we do have some soulish/psychological fellowship with them, still - and we have a tremendous amount of bodily/physical fellowship with them, since that part of our nature is exactly the same as them, for now.
Salvation is of the Lord. He uses believers, with new life in Christ radiating through the believer, as a canvas on which to both display and draw folks to saving knowledge and trust of His Son, Jesus Christ. Will being in contact with any light that God shines through us save them? No, not by itself - for blind eyes cannot see - but the same Lord that is giving us life, liberty, hope, holiness, visible to our neighbors - that same Lord is the convicter, convincer and converter, opening their eyes, presenting Christ, convicting them of the deadness and wrongness of their current life, drawing them to His Son - glory!
Practically, it DOES make a tremendous difference if someone shines for Christ in the midst of a dark world. And if that someone is kindly affectioned toward me - showing friendliness, empathy, sympathy and love toward me as a lost person, that is regularly, wonderfully used by God as opportunities are found to present the gospel, and to receive new life. That is most certainly how I was saved - God using some wonderful Christians to develop a relationship with me when I didn’t deserve it, and they would have been better off spiritually not to be within a thousand feet of me! (I was saved at 24 years old, and was an especially rotten person) Thank God for their kind hearts! The same God that prompted them to (yes) fellowship with me at the level of our common humanity used them as a great door open for me to hear the Gospel and be saved, much later. Now we have an altogether different type and level of fellowship! :)
Recognizing and developing appropriate (though obviously limited) fellowship on the above levels with lost folks whom we desperately want to see come to Christ gets us into position to be used of God when He moves in to save them - I like being part of the action, and I’m sure we all do!
Certainly, we must employ wisdom about the limits of such relationships (the boat must get in the water, but the water must not get into the boat!) - and Brian has outlined much of that danger for us in previous posts, all showing much wisdom - but we don’t want to err too much the other way, either. Separation, biblically - good. Isolation - no. We all know that.
P.S. The best witnessing/gospel presentation help for me has been Ray Comfort’s “The Way of the Master” series (www.wayofthemaster.com). We went through it at church, and I have used his wonderfully biblical and powerful approach to present the gospel and see God grant people salvation. I am going in an hour to continue to disciple a new believer who trusted Christ when I presented the gospel in this manner to him just two months ago, in March. He uses very creative methods to apply the Law of God, specifically the Ten Commandments and their deeper, spiritual analogues in the Sermon on the Mount, to people’s consciences. It is very thorough, and is recommended (see their website) by John MacArthur. It has really helped me, and allowed me to participate in winning souls to Christ, which I am naturally not very good at, apparently. I cannot recommend it too highly!
Those in darkness hate the light, because it exposes their evil deeds. The relationships being described here between those of the light and those who walk in darkness cannot be reconciled with the truth of Scripture.
They are like oil and water…not only do they not mix…they CAN’T mix, not until such time as the water becomes oily, or the oil is transformed into water. In other words, either the unsaved person (who is walking in darkness) must move toward the light - which, according to Scripture does not happen except by the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit (resulting in the one walking in darkness becoming a child of light)…or, the one in the light must move toward the darkness, away from the light…resulting in compromise of the truth, compromise of witness, compromise of the gospel.
Sadly, it appears from these descriptions of “close”, “real”, “personal”, “meaningful” relationships that involve “fellowship” with the world, that personal experience trumps what the word of God infallibly teaches about the subject.
do you not know that friendship with the world is hostility toward God? Therefore whoever wishes to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God. - James 4:4
A believer can’t rub shoulders for very long with those in the world without either a)becoming worldy himself, or b)experiencing hostility and persecution for the name of Christ because of his stand on the truth of the gospel, and unwillingness to compromise and succomb to the temptations of the world. I fear that anything that happens in between of those two things may be a result of being lukewarm.
Are we to hole ourselves up somewhere so as not to come into contact with the world? No. Will we have aquaintences and associations with the world in our day-to-day living (at work, in the operations of a business, etc.)? Yes. Are we to invest time and energy building close, personal, meaningful, real relationsships with those in the world? Scripture seems abundantly clear that the answer is “No”…regardless of what our feelings or experiences tell us. Experience should never trump the objective truth of the Bible.
“Experience should never trump the objective truth of God”
Amen! And double Amen!
I still disagree with you, but I shall take your thoughts to heart Brian.
Emmett, thanks for your comments. One of the things you said was this:
P.S. The best witnessing/gospel presentation help for me has been Ray Comfort’s “The Way of the Master” series (www.wayofthemaster.com). We went through it at church, and I have used his wonderfully biblical and powerful approach to present the gospel and see God grant people salvation… He uses very creative methods to apply the Law of God, specifically the Ten Commandments and their deeper, spiritual analogues in the Sermon on the Mount, to people’s consciences.
I, too, am excited about what Way of the Master is doing. However, what they are doing is NOT just another “creative” method for evangelism. What they are doing is PURELY biblical…law and grace, law and grace, law and grace. Law to the proud…grace to the humble. The only thing that convicts is the law, and they have rediscovered that the good news of the cross is meaningless without the bad news that all stand condemned before a holy and just God who will judge the world in righteousness.
What they are doing is that simple…they are presenting a basic message that says you have broken God’s law and have no hope of reconciliation to the Father without faith alone in Jesus Christ, who came and died - fulfilling all righteousness - as a substitute for sinners.
What is interesting about their approach is that it involves NO prior relationship building…have you noticed that? It would seem that what they are doing sorta goes against some people’s line of thinking that a prior relationship somehow helps the gospel get accepted by those who have been befriended by believers prior to their conversion.
Anyway, thanks so much for your questions and comments. Grace and peace to you and yours.
I have heard a little about “The way of the master”. It does seem to be decent at presenting evangelism.
I would also bring up the idea that a Christian cannot have a real relationship with an unbeliever if they do not feel for their position as lost. In what kind of relationship would a person keep what is needed most from someone who needs it most?
NO REAL ONE
Believers are able to relate only because they were once lost too. We must remeber this. This must be the root of evangelism. This kind of relationship between two people does not require a ‘prior relationship’ but an internal one. [This does not mean that a prior relationship would not serve to strengthen these aspects of preaching for some people.]
The point is how will someone convince another that they are lost if they don’t fully believe it and act accordingly themselves. Presenting the Gospel is not some aloof thing. It requires the evangelist to devote his whole heart and soul toward the endeavor. Paul even says that he travails until Christ be formed in you. (to the Corinithians?) This ‘travailing’ is related to having birthing pains.
I will also say it is not enough in evangelism to drop the G-bomb and run off thinking you have done your job. It is the other end oppose to just christian outreach. The point of evangelism is the evangelist is to place himself as a fork in the road in the unbeliever heart and present two paths. By God and the evangelist’s plea, the unbeliever may choose the right one. Yet, we are to also spread the seed widely and let it fall where it may. On rocky soil or on fertile soil.
This is the root of any meaningful relationship between a believer and unbeliever. Its foundation is the need of Christ and the ablity to sympathize with the unbeliever’s weaknesses as fellow man. I have yet to hear of any ‘work’ relationships outside of Christ as inherently meaningful.