Dug Down Deep

Dug Down Deep by Josh HarrisCan you believe it’s been five years since we last saw a new book from Josh Harris (assuming we don’t count the re-titling and re-release of Not Even a Hint / Sex Is Not the Problem, Lust Is)? His last book was Stop Dating the Church which released all the way back near the end of 2004. But the wait is over. Today he returns with Dug Down Deep, a book whose title is drawn from Jesus’ parable about the man who dug deep to build the foundation for his house (see Luke 6:46-49). The rains poured, the river rose, but the house on the solid foundation stood firm. You know the story. Harris says, “digging down and building on the rock isn’t a picture of being nominally religious or knowing Jesus from a distance. Being a Christian means being a person who labors to establish his beliefs, his dreams, his choices, his very view of the world on the truth of who Jesus is and what he has accomplished—a Christian who cares about truth, who cares about sound doctrine.”

This is a book about sound doctrine. It is a book that encourages the reader to embrace that much-maligned word theology. “We’re either building our life on the reality of what God is truly like and what he’s about, or we’re basing our life on our own imagination and misconceptions. We’re all theologians. The question is whether we will be good theologians or bad theologians, whether what we know about God is true or false.”

The “I” in the book’s subtitle offers a hint at how Harris is going to go about teaching theology: “Unearthing What I Believe and Why It Matters.” In the book’s opening pages he writes, “This book is the story of how I first glimpsed the beauty of Christian theology. These pages are the journal entries of my own spiritual journey—a journey that led to the realization that sound doctrine is at the center of loving Jesus with passion and authenticity. I want to share how I learned that orthodoxy isn’t just for old men but for anyone who longs to behold a God who is bigger and more real and glorious than the human mind can imagine.” So maybe this book is best described as a theological autobiography (or would that be an autobiographical theology?).

Each of the chapters describes, defines and celebrates a particular point of doctrine and it does so from within the context of Harris’ own life. Among the topics he covers are the transcendence and the nature of God, the doctrines of Scripture, the uniqueness of Christ, the atonement, the Holy Spirit, and the church. In each case he shows how these truths have captivated him and he shows how they have transformed his life.

Let me pause here for one moment to make an observation.

Last year I came up with a tongue-in-cheek metric I call the Piper Factor. It measures how much what is said in a particular book has already been said (and usually said better) by John Piper. Trust me when I say there are some books out there that draw so heavily on Piper that I have to wonder how a publisher justified their existence. Lately I have extended the measure to the other Usual Reformed Suspects (Dever, Mahaney, Grudem, Carson, Packer, …). I look for the influencers behind a book and, if it is written by a Reformed author, I very often find that they come from a very narrow group of writers. I’m sure similar measures can be used across any field (try reading a book about technology that doesn’t rely on McLuhan and Postman, for example).

It is generally quite easy to measure the Piper Factor—you need only turn to a book’s end notes or bibliography and see who is there. How many of the book’s major points are drawn from one of these authors? How much of the book’s teaching is drawn from a rather narrow spectrum of similar authors? I can say that my own book drew very heavily from such authors. Harris’ book measures about the same. Packer? Check. Grudem? Check. Bridges? Carson? Check. Check.

Now let me say that the Piper Factor in no way indicates an actual problem with the book. n fact, I would be inclined to argue just the opposite. Instead it just shows that the writer has drawn primarily from a shallow pool of books that many of us have already read. In the case of Dug Down Deep this makes perfect sense since the book tells the story of how Harris came to the theological convictions he describes here. And, like all of us, he did so through good books written by godly men.

Back to the review and to my reason for raising the Piper Factor.

The greatest strength or the greatest overall contribution of Dug Down Deep is probably not in the content of what it teaches since this can largely be found elsewhere, in the books Harris draws upon. He is not advancing some radically new theological agenda or calling people to some new revelation of God. The strength of the book, what sets it apart from similar titles, is in the integration of Harris’ life with the theology he describes. Its strength is in its targeting of the audience he seeks to reach. Here he offers a fresh take on these points of theology, not only expressing them in his own life but also explaining why they are so dear to him. The book is particularly well-suited, then, to the younger audience that continues to follow Harris. Though there is benefit for any of us in reading again of the great truths of the Christian faith and in hearing how one believer has integrated these into his life, I would expect that the greatest benefit will be for younger Christians who, like Harris, have grown up in the church and who, like Harris as a young man, have heard these truths without actually embracing them. Here they can be mentored by a godly man whose passion for truth, whose passion for theology that extends to every area of life, is clear on every page.

Dug Down Deep is an excellent book and one I would be glad to recommend. I wouldn’t hesitate to hand it to any Christian but would be particularly pleased to see it in the hands of young believers. In fact, if my own children were just a few years older, I would hand a copy to each of them. And I’m not sure that I can give a book higher praise than that.

(Stay tuned this afternoon for a brief interview I conducted with Josh)

Comments (16)

1
Anonymous's picture

Good to know!

Thanks for the review of this one!

2
Anonymous's picture

Looking forward to the interview. From the review, this seems to be exactly what I was hoping it would be. Information is everywhere. What we need now is encouragement. Josh’s book seems to be one to do just that. I’m looking forward to grabbing a copy.

-Marshall Jones Jr.

3
Anonymous's picture

Sounds really great. Thanks for the review. The conversations in my little circle lately have been about the value of knowing theology, and how it really is Ok, and what more, beneficial, and at best, bedrock to life. And you’re right - I hope this book hits the younger set who have been following Harris (like I have) for a while. Perhaps it’ll bleed over into his Rebelution brothers!

4
Anonymous's picture

Tim,As I am at the upper end of your blog’s age demographic, this comment of Harris’ really struck me:

” … I want to share how I learned that orthodoxy isn’t just for old men but for anyone who longs to behold a God who is bigger and more real and glorious than the human mind can imagine.”

The more I learn about God the more I find myself regretting that I didn’t really learn the spiritual truths of the Gospel earlier in my lifetime. It’s in the wake of my past that the Word vividly illuminates both the trash and the treasure. And I can assure you that the first far outweighs the second by a very wide margin. This fact convicts me, and the regret of spiritual sloth dissolves and drives me to my knees with the realization that had it not been for His infinite grace, I would have lived and died never seeing the “trash” or knowing His free gift.

This book is now on my “Faith” wish list on Amazon!

Thanks Tim!

Dan…

5
Anonymous's picture

As for the “Piper factor,” I’m pleased that those he has influenced take up the same subjects because I’m one of the few who doesn’t like Piper’s writing. It’s practically heretical to say such a thing on blogs like this. But “Desiring God,” for example, has got to be one the most overrated Christian books out there, if judged on how readable it is. One has to wonder how many of his books are just edited “sermon dumps.”

6
Anonymous's picture

Speaking of the “Piper Factor”, on the subject of doctrine in a proper perspective, he says this:”From a biblical standpoint studying and thinking and knowing are never ends in themselves; they always stand in the service of feeling and willing and doing. The mind is the servant of the heart. Knowledge exists for the sake of love. And all theology worth its salt produces doxology.”

BTW - I just heard Piper on a Podcast say that, referring to “Christian Hedonism”, it wasn’t his idea. In fact, many before him (Johnathan Edwards) have explained it better than he has.

BTW 2 - G.K. Chesterton seems to be always on the tongue of many of our modern day reformed pastors and theologians.

The J-Bomb Blog

7
Anonymous's picture

Thanks for this, Tim. I was asked to review this by Waterbrook Multnomah and posted my review yesterday. It can be found here:

http://www.aclutteredmind.org/were_trying_this_again/dug_down_deep_a_book_review.html

Keep up the good work!

8
Anonymous's picture

Don’t forget the Piper Factor when it comes to sooo many of the sermons out there…

9
Anonymous's picture

Am I wrong to be concerned that Donald Miller not only endorses this book but that Mr. Harris (and or his publisher) felt it was proper to put Mr. Miller’s endorsement anywhere on or in this book (much less on the top of the front cover)? Is the call of this book (to embrace theology to the glory of God) not the exact opposite of the postmodern, liberal theological perspective that Mr. Miller writes from?

From Mr. Challies’ review of “Blue Like Jazz:” - “I believe, though, that the great failing of this book is the author’s belief that Christianity is a feeling, and is not something that can be rationally explained or understood. Early in the book, on page 54, Miller writes that God does not make any sense. Just a few pages later he writes that Christian Spirituality is something that cannot be explained, but is something that can only be felt…This irrational, feelings-based approach to Christianity is consistent with postmodern thought, where experience rather than an objective standard is the arbiter of truth. Miller rarely returns to the Scripture, and instead opts to explain his beliefs through the lens of his own experience.”

In a November 2006 article entitled “Books and Beliefs,” Mr. Challies writes that a tell-tell sign that something “is not right” with a church is the books that are recommended to visitors. Mr. Challies rightfully includes Mr. Miller’s “Blue Like Jazz” in this list.

My point, or question, then: why did Mr. Harris put Mr. Miller’s name on the front cover? Mr. Miller shuns, mocks, and sometimes literally profanes some of the precious doctrines taught by the Bible. Mr. Miller rejects notions of objective, doctrinal truth in scripture and instead embraces postmodern, liberal theology. His writings most certainly lead some readers astray from the truth.

If I read Mr. Harris’ book and see that Mr. Harris obviously thinks highly enough of Mr. Miller to put his name and quote on the cover, it would be perfectly logical for me to conclude the Mr. Miller’s books are also valuable (if I didn’t know who he was or what he stood for). Why risk this? Why not put a quote from Piper, Packer, MacArthur, or Dever on the cover?

I’m not trying to split hairs or be divisive. But isn’t the point of this book that Christians should embrace sound doctrine to the glory of God? And isn’t the foundation of Mr. Miller’s “theology” a rejection of the doctrines of grace and the sovereignty of God?

Am I out of line for being so troubled by this? Or is it no big deal and I need to get a life?

10
Anonymous's picture

I’m out too. Won’t buy it because of the Donald Miller endorsement. Pastor Harris, what are you thinking?

11
Anonymous's picture

Again, I’m not trying to be divisive. I’m going to read the book and I pray God will be glorified by what He reveals to me through it. But the endorsement is troubling. Perhaps Mr. Harris didn’t make that decision? Perhaps it was the publisher? I don’t know how these things work.

12
Anonymous's picture

Maybe an “ad fontes” approach is needed again?

13
Anonymous's picture

Re: the Donald Miller endorsement - wouldn’t one way to get the attention of some of the younger Emergent crowd and challenge their thinking be to have one of their leaders endorse this book?

14
Anonymous's picture

Interesting discussions here. Also, I just cracked up when I read about the Piper Factor! I did listen to Piper consistently for a year, but then thought his sermons are just too Calvinistic in its flavour… however, I really enjoy listening to Josh Harris’ sermons and have been doing that since 2004. Josh seems more “real” & his sermons have actual impact on our lives. I long to see more young people in Australia get into theology proper instead of getting stuck at “me-ology” that is so prominent of the culture here. It makes me wonder if Jesus is the Lord of their lives or if THEY wanna be God and Jesus is their servant!?!?! Wake up, Australia!

15
Anonymous's picture

Ms. Starke, I understand your point, but how far to you take that? Should Mr. Harris, or any of us, put the name of any prominent heretic on our books just so that we can reach the lost? Why not find a prominent Roman Catholic to put on the cover to attract those readers? Or a Muslim? Or a Mormon? Is it edifying to put a heretic on the cover?

And there is a larger point for me personally: if Donald Miller, with all the things I know he believes about theology, likes this book and would recommend it to his audience, then I’m inclined to run in the other direction. Talk about a red flag!

16
Anonymous's picture

I think we are going a bit far in describing Donald Miller as liberal, or a heretic. he may be off in a little bit on a few issues. But he seems to endorse the basic tenets of the Christian faith. His book is introspective but that does not mean that he believes that is the only way he can gain knowledge of God.He is a member and regularly attendee of Imago Dei Community a church in Portland. Their doctrinal statement (http://www.imagodeicommunity.com/article/core-doctrine/) is solidly evangelical though not reformed. I think we need to be more careful when we call people heretics.(Note: The church also has some gender issues which are very problematic, but it does not mean that one should not read harris book because of millers comment.)