Counterfeit Detection (Part 1)

"Federal agents don't learn to spot counterfeit money by studying the counterfeits. They study genuine bills until they master the look of the real thing. Then when they see the bogus money they recognize it." I can't count the number of times I have read quotes similar to that one, taken from John MacArthur's Reckless Faith. It seems that whenever an author wishes to discuss discernment, he mentions federal agents and the method they use to discern the genuine from the counterfeit. I have often wondered if this metaphor is accurate and whether agents truly do study genuine currency first. Curious person that I am, I decided to find some answers. I called the Bank of Canada, worked my way through various levels of bureaucracy, and eventually arranged a meeting with one of the nation's foremost experts on counterfeit currency.

I twice missed the Bank of Canada building, one of just five local offices in Canada, before finally spying the appropriate address. There is no sign on the outside of the heavily-tinted glass building to announce what is within. As I entered the sole door, I found myself in a tiny foyer, only a few feet square. The door ahead was barred and an small sign announced that I was to press an intercom button and to announce my business. I pressed the button and stated that I was there to conduct an interview. After checking my name against a list, the security guard unlocked the door and I was permitted to proceed into a bare reception area. The doors locked behind me and a series of locked doors were ahead of me. The occasional person passed through these turnstile doors, but only after swiping a security card. The turnstiles allowed only one person to enter before locking once more. I passed my identification through a small opening cut into a foot-thick glass window. The guard made a copy of it and passed it back to me along with a visitor's pass. A few minutes later I was greeted by Monica, the expert on currency, and we walked through bare, utilitarian corridors until we found a vacant meeting room.

Monica was far friendlier than the security guard, though she had to bring along a tape recorder and later mentioned that some poor soul would later make a complete transcription of our conversation. She asked me about my interest in counterfeit currency and I told her about my interest in the field of discernment and the constant metaphors I have encountered that point towards the training provided to federal agents. She seemed interested and decided that she would provide me with a basic rundown of how agents are trained and would then hand me a stack of mixed currency--different denominations, some of which was genuine and some of which was counterfeit--and allow me to test my training.

And so we began. It turns out that John MacArthur is correct. Training in identifying counterfeit currency begins with studying genuine money. There are certain identifying characteristics that are added to each bill printed by the Bank of Canada. These characteristics are necessarily difficult to reproduce. Some are intended to stump the casual counterfeiter, armed with no more than a scanner and color laser printer, and some will stump the more serious counterfeiter, even if armed with expensive, high-tech equipment. She summarized the approach to distinguishing a genuine bill with the phrase, "touch, tilt, look at, look through." The first step then, is to touch the bill. Because currency is printed on unique cotton-based paper, a false bill will often feel false. She described the most common reaction to the feel of a counterfeit bill as "waxy." A person may not quite be able to describe it, but it just feels wrong. There are also two areas on a bill where raised print provides a tactile clue to a genuine bill.

Having touched the bill, Monica described the "tilt" features. First she pointed out the holographic stripe which is remarkably difficult to accurately reproduce. When the bill is tilted, this holograph will show all the colors of the rainbow. Additionally, each tiny maple leaf on the bill is color-split, so that it appears in two colors simultaneously. And, when studied closely, tiny numbers identifying the denomination of the bill will appear in the background of this stripe.

The third step is to look through the money. By holding a bill to the light, several features appear. There is a small, ghost-like watermark image of the bill's main portrait. In the case of a $20 bill, this means that a tiny portrait of Queen Elizabeth II appears immediately beside a more pronounced portrait. Another of these "look through" features is a gold thread woven through the bill that will appear solid when held up against a light source, but broken or staggered if counterfeited.

The final step is to look at. "Look at" features include fine-line printing within the bill's portrait and certain background patterns. These lines and patterns are so fine that they cannot be adequately reproduced by the casual counterfeiter.

We spent a small amount of time examining security features of some of the older bills that are still in circulation, and the features that are unique to lower denominations of currency. All the while I plied Monica with questions. She provided a thorough and helpful answer to every question I could think of.

That was my introduction to counterfeit detection.

And now my training would be put to the test. Monica placed before me a stack of bills of varying denominations. I knew that some were genuine and some were counterfeit. The first, a twenty dollar bill, immediately struck me as a forgery. Just as she said, it felt waxy and seemed to have been printed on standard pulp-based paper. I tilted it and noted that the holographic stripe was not really holographic at all. Though I was already convinced that this was a forgery, I pressed on and noted that no portrait of the Queen appeared when the bill was held to the light, and the fine-line printed was blurry and imprecise. It was clearly a counterfeit.

The next bill was a genuine five dollar bill. I examined the bill and found that everything seemed in order. The security features were in-place. The print was sharp and hidden features appeared just as they should.

I continued to move through the stack of bills. One bill almost seemed sound, but then I noted the thinnest white edge on the bill, showing that it had been poorly cut from a sheet of white paper.

I soon learned that identifying counterfeit currency is not a terribly difficult task. When a person knows what to look for, when he has been trained to examine the bill for particular identifying characteristics, identifying genuine from fraudulent can be done with great accuracy, even on the basis of only a small amount of training. I successfully identified each piece of counterfeit currency.

I will continue this article tomorrow by sharing some lessons I learned at the Bank of Canada.

Comments (18)

1
Anonymous's picture

Tim, congratulations on your detective work. If we only applied this method of interogation to our Biblical studies, and as Paul exhorts us to prove all things, there would be far less misapplied truth.

Thanks for the interesting read...looking forward to chapter 2.

God bless,
Jim

2
Anonymous's picture

Tim,

You made me feel like I was at one of those old-style Saturday films where they keep you on the edge of the seat until next weekend...

I wonder if that applies to all currency across the borders?

Hmmm... I will start watching for counterfeit Canadian bills...

Sam

3
Anonymous's picture

I was employed as a bank teller after college and we were trained in a similar fashion. This of course was before the days of holograms and watermarks ever made it to the US. The person training us keyed very heavily on touch.

It was amazing how quickly you could pick out a counterfeit bill after handling thousands of genuine bills a day. It was that initial touch that caused one to stop and do further investigation.

I remember finidng several counterfeit bills this way.

Counterfeit money is indeed an excellent analogy of spiritual discernment. The more you are exposed to the truth of God's word the more likely you are to say "Hold on. Something doesn't seem right here" when first encountering false teaching.

On the flip side when a person is consistently handling counterfeit "doctrine" true doctrine will seem strange and false to them. This is why so many in seeker churches balk at the idea of God's wrath, judgement, etc. To them these seem like falsehoods.

4
Anonymous's picture

I myself heard John MacArthur give that counterfeit bill illustration a few times over my years at Grace. Thanks for taking us "behind the scenes" on this particular illustration! A nice reminder for us to be equally (and more) diligent in the pursuit of truth.

5
Anonymous's picture

Tim-

This is a great post. I have always been rather incredulous when I heard this claim, and I did not know it originated (or was popularized) by MacArthur. Sometimes I seem really contrarian when I comment on your posts, and I'm sorry for that. I would get tired of typing "I agree" in all the other posts. :v)

Perhaps a more nuanced way of presenting the analogy - - is agents study the genuine bills intensely, so that they develop almose a "second sense" to "sniff out" a counterfeit...

But, that training is supplemented by the advice of experts who can tell you which features cannot be reproduced. In a sense, the expert on currency told you what to look for. She didn't emphasize features like "square corners" or "the queen's picture" because those are easily counterfeited.

In the same way, we should listen to the advice of trusted Christians about which features of orthodox Christianity are mirrored in cults, etc., and which other features are not typically found in aberrant groups. You become a much more efficient counterfeit expert if you are familiar with the most common errors made by imposters.

6
Anonymous's picture

Did you really doubt MacArthur? Just kidding, interesting post, Tim

7
Anonymous's picture

Can't wait to read the rest.

8
Anonymous's picture

I especially loved the "hold it up to the light" test!

9
Anonymous's picture

US bills are much the same, I was pleased to know! Great post, I agree with Jerry!

I loved that book, I read it recently and posted a review of it on my blog.

I, too, look forward to seeing the next chapter, and I do agree with what was already said: Handling of true doctrine will make the false easier to recognize. I was hit with that one again last night as I listened to another MacArthur message: "God's Word and Our Spiritual Growth", it is like a breath of fresh air after a long debate I had with a friend who thought that John Eldredges books are good!

10
Anonymous's picture

My 6 children and I, along with a friend and her 3 deaf children, went on a field trip to The Federal Reserve in Oklahoma City. The experience was much like you described. They also talked about doing away with paper money and paper checks possibly in the near future.

Truly this is an excellent illustration in regards to discernment. Our church youth group just finished memorizing the entire book of Titus...
Titus 1:9 says that an Elder must be "holding fast the faithful word which is in accordance with the teaching, so that he will be able both to exhort in sound doctrine and to refute those who contradict" (that takes discernment)

Now we are memorizing the book of Philippians. Php 1: 9, says, "And this I pray, that your love may abound still more and more in real knowledge and all discernment, so that you may approve the things that are excellent, in order to be sincere and blameless until the day of Christ."

So being discerning is not just for Elders and Pastors or those with "the gift" of discerment... it is for all that proclaim Christ.... just like spreading the Gospel is a command to all Christians. No excuses.

Are not those with a "gift" to be examples of that gift so that others can observe from them how to be Biblically discerning, how to share the Gospel... etc.?

11
Anonymous's picture

Good post...
I had no idea Canada was organized enough to print money. I assumed you used pebbles as currency.

12
Anonymous's picture

"I assumed you used pebbles as currency."

Paper currency is currently replacing the pretty shells and shiny rocks we've used to this point.

13
Anonymous's picture

You get all the cool field trips, Tim! But this is a cool anecdote, and in itself an application of what you are trying to get across (don't take MacArthur's word for it, go and check it out yourself).

As it happens, just this afternoon a cow-orker and I were examining some of the cheques our company received in the mail recently, checking out (no pun intended) the new security features that banks are implementing. One of the newest ones I've seen is heat-sensitive ink: certain objects on the cheque are visible as long as it remains cool, but if you touch them, they disappear with the heat of your fingers.

14
Anonymous's picture

Great post, quite the super-sleuth! The claim always made sense to me, but thanks for some personal investigative reporting.

I read the claim in "Fools Gold" I think, again a book on discernment. Looking forward to the next instalment.

15
Anonymous's picture

"I read the claim in "Fools Gold" I think, again a book on discernment. Looking forward to the next instalment."

That's likely. Much of "Fool's Gold" was drawn directly from "Reckless Faith."

16
Anonymous's picture

Hunh. I'd heard the metaphor used through the years (haven't read it from MacArthur) and was always curious if this was so or just a handy story. . . Cool to know. . . Thanks for checking that out!

17
Anonymous's picture

Tim,

Thanks for this interesting post. This is undoubtedly a time where the counterfeits of the enmy gain rather easy footing in our Lord's Church so in my view this is a very timely and important subject.

I do know that Dr. Walter Martin used this analogy re. the study of counterfeit currency as well. On a positive note, the fact that Satan counterfeits Christian teaching is proof of the original!

18
Anonymous's picture

Nice to know someone is looking out for counterfeits.

Ken Blanchard