Surprised by Suffering

Surprised by SufferingBlogs often have a living quality to them, where an author picks up older content, improves it, and posts it again. I’ve been known to do this and have seen plenty of other bloggers do the same. And why not, really. The medium lends itself well to that kind of change and growth and evolution. Occasionally those who write books have the opportunity to do the same thing, to take an older book, improve it, add to it, and print it again. Such is the case with R.C. Sproul’s Surprised by Suffering. First released by Tyndale House in 1988, it has subsequently be expanded and re-released by Reformation Trust, typically a sign that the rights to the book had reverted back to the author.

Surprised by Suffering deals with “The Role of Pain and Death in the Christian Life” (according to the subtitle). And it deals with it well. Sproul wants the reader to know that, though death is a foreign state to humanity, one that came about only by the fall into sin, it is nonetheless inevitable and something that God expects us to do well. “Death is unnatural. It may be natural to fallen man, but it was not natural to man as he was created. Man was not created to die. He was created with the possibility of death, but not with the necessity of death. Death was introduced as a consequence of sin. If there had been no sin, there would be no death. But when sin entered, the curse of the fall was added. All suffering and death flow out of the complex of sin.”

Here Sproul writes about a wide variety of topics relating to suffering and death, with the first half of the book looking at life leading up to death and the second half looking at life after death. A book that is pastoral in its tone, Sproul offers hope to the Christian as he faces the inevitability of suffering and dying.

There is a sense in which death is a calling, a vocation, that God demands each of us to face. “Death is a divine appointment. It is part of God’s purpose for our lives. God calls each person to die. He is sovereign over all of life, including the final experience of life.” And when God talks to us of death, he emphasizes not where or why or when we will die, but how. “When Scripture speaks of the how of death, the focus is on the spiritual state of the person at the time of his death. Here we see the ‘how’ of death reduced to only two options. We either die in faith or we die in our sins.” This leads us, of course, to the gospel which offers us the only hope we can have as our eyes close in death.

If there is a chapter that stood out to me above all the others, it is the one titled “Speculations on Life after Death.” Here I see an example of what Sproul does so well—of what sets him apart as an author. Almost without reference to Scripture, depending simply upon force of logic and common sense and Christian worldview, he undoes the arguments of some great philosophers. He writes about “oughts” and the need for judgment handed out by a perfect judge. And only in the next chapter does he turn to the Bible to show what Scripture says. Some Christians balk at this, demanding a certain number of references to Scripture as if the simple number of references correlates to the author’s faithfulness to it.

But what we see with Sproul is that his whole way of thinking has been shaped by Scripture. He can go through a chapter with little reference to the Bible because the whole way he thinks is formed by the Bible. Eventually he gets to chapter and verse in order to claim the authority of God through his Word. But first he undoes secular arguments without and yet in a way completely consistent with the Bible.

A book that is eminently quotable, full of pithy phrases to stir the heart and give hope to the suffering and dying, Surprised by Suffering has found new life in this new edition. I highly recommend it.

Comments (15)

1
Anonymous's picture

Thanks for the excellent review of what sounds like a worthwhile meditation on suffering and the Christian.

I’m so thankful for writers in the reformed tradition who point us to solid biblical truth, in this era when so many promulgate a false, pain-free, Cross-less Christianity.

Grace in Him,

Alex

2
Anonymous's picture

Thank you for reviewing it. I don’t usually do this, but I ordered it on the spot. This week I was diagnosed with a very slow growing malignant brain tumor, so I’ve been wrestling with these exact same questions. Death seems so unnatrual and yet normal and yet the christian world seems to always tell someone else differently. It’s very difficult to live both at this point and indeed, most patients fix themselves on one or the other. Anyway, thanks.

3
Anonymous's picture

I cannot agree with Tim more. This book was very helpful when my mom was diagnosed with terminal cancer . Its written with a pastoral heart and Sproul is at his finest

It has been a great source of comfort and wisdom again as my wife went through cancer treatment 2 years ago. It is one book that should be in every Christians personal library, for we all will have to come face to face with suffering and death sooner or later.

4
Anonymous's picture

There is a sense in which death is a calling, a vocation, that God demands each of us to face. “Death is a divine appointment. It is part of God’s purpose for our lives. God calls each person to die. He is sovereign over all of life, including the final experience of life.” And when God talks to us of death, he emphasizes not where or why or when we will die, but how.”

That is very helpful.

5
Anonymous's picture

Sproule makes a very reductionist statement here: “Death is unnatural. It may be natural to fallen man, but it was not natural to man as he was created. Man was not created to die. He was created with the possibility of death, but not with the necessity of death. Death was introduced as a consequence of sin. If there had been no sin, there would be no death. But when sin entered, the curse of the fall was added. All suffering and death flow out of the complex of sin.”

How do we know that God did not intend man to die physically? Was not man called to replenish the earth. Does replenishing require death before replenishment? So sin didn’t bring about death (physical) to humans. Sin brought about spiritual death. Man didn’t die a physical death after eating the forbidden fruit - he died physically hundreds of years later. What happened at the fall was an immediate spiritual separation-death from the relationship man enjoyed with God.

So in my mind - death is purely natural to man (as it is to all creation). ie physical. BUT spiritual death came as a consequence of sin and that was not the way God intended. Man under his own free will chose to not listen to the voice of God - rather the father of all lies - Satan.

(As an aside - was death not already in the creation - is not all the creation sustained by life and death in a marvelous and miraculous cycle of life and death? Just take a look at how the ‘natural’ world works. Death is all around us. But is it not a good death and how God intended it to be?)

6
Anonymous's picture

Calling “death’ a vocation is heavy stuff man.

It is a calling…but its a curse. But we do have to face it. And we have to face suffering or be beated down by it. There really isn’t any in between is there?

David, Red Letter Believers Blog, “Salt and Light”www.redletterbelievers.com

7
Anonymous's picture

AJY

Actually I believe both spiritual and physical death happened at the fall.At the moment I don’t have time to go into detail about some Bible passages that speak about physical death, but I believe Gen. 2:9; 3:22-24 is a good place to start.Perhaps someone else who has more time can speak on this aspect?

8
Anonymous's picture

Tim C.,

Would this book help one who has been dealing w/ some pretty heavy depression. I know God is doing a work, but sometimes I just loose focus.

Kind regards,

Thomas

9
Anonymous's picture

No Physical Death Before the Fall? http://paleo.cc/ce/nodeath.htm

10
Anonymous's picture

One of the surprises of my life has been discovering that Jesus will let me suffer. Yet one of the great realities I’ve discovered is His love and good for me in the suffering.

11
Anonymous's picture

AJY

Seeing as how you have linked me to an article supporting your position; I thought it only fair that I link you to an article supporting my position. [url]http://www.the-highway.com/resurrection_Misselbrook.html[/url]You should notice that in this article, it deals with a few issues that your article brings up, such as 1 Cor. 15.

I am a little surprised that others haven’t said anything concerning your position, seeing how it comes from an Old Earth perspective.

12
Anonymous's picture

It doesn’t make sense to say this in one sentence: “Man was not created to die. He was created with the possibility of death, but not with the necessity of death. Death was introduced as a consequence of sin. If there had been no sin, there would be no death.” and then say this in a later one: “Death is a divine appointment. It is part of God’s purpose for our lives. God calls each person to die.”

According to the first statement, death is a punishment. According to the second it’s a “divine appointment.” Forgive me if I don’t see those two statements logically linking up.

13
Anonymous's picture

Brandon

I understand why you have problem linking these two things together.However, there are two senses which they link up.One speaks of our original state; the other speaks of a result of our new state.

There is something else that doesn’t seem to add up to me, which perhaps might be related to the fact that I have done a lot of thinking and studying on the subject.That is that in every case I have come across, those who believe there was death before the fall, all believe in an Old Earth.

Unless I am missing something, there is something in this worth considering.

14
Anonymous's picture

Believe me at the age of 53yo I’ve considered this over many years as well Tom and can reach no other conclusion at this point in time that the ‘old earth’ hypothesis stands as a viable option with death being part and parcel of what took place in and around the garden. (Now before you go off on your high horse, this doesn’t equate to ‘evolution’). Rather it sees things in the natural world as God may have intended them to be - a physical death being quite reasonable. Wow how can you account for this amazing design of creation otherwise? How can anyone understand the predatory nature of some species etc etc without acknowledging that God planned death in (at least) the animal and plant kingdom. How can Adam aeven contemplate what death is if he (and she) hadn’t already experienced it in the garden? We digress from Tim’s post…

15
Anonymous's picture

AJYI agree with you that we have digressed from Tim’s post. That is why I am only going to say that if we use a consistent hermeneutic throughout Scripture we end up with both a young Earth (i.e. Yom (Hebrew for Day) with a numeral equals a 24 hour period.) and physical death happening only after the fall (see article I provided).By the way, I don’t necessarily believe that all those who believe in an old Earth are evolutionists (no high horse coming from me ;-). After all I was once one, but that was before I understood hermeneutics. Not that I have it all figured out.I believe it is possible to hold an Old Earth view, yet hold to the majority of other important Bible doctrines correctly (for example the doctrines of grace). But at the same time, if that same person really was consistent (none of us is perfect) they would eventually come to realize that an Old Earth is not (hermeneutically speaking) consistent with the hermeneutics that they used to discover the doctrine of grace.Sorry I have digressed even more from Tim’s post; I better stop there.