- RSS FeedSubscribe
- « Previous PostFriday Ramblings
- Next Post »Book Review - On Being Presbyterian
Canada Day Reflections
- 07/01/06
- 8
It has become customary that on July 1, Canada, I reflect, if only briefly, on my nation. Two years ago I wrote "On Canada Day and Kissing The Mailman." It was something of a mournful article in which I reflected on Canada's decision to elect the still-corrupt Liberal Party, despite years of waste, corruption and mismanagement. "This year, as I reflect on my country, I feel a bit like a man who has caught his wife kissing the mailman the day before they were to celebrate their anniversary. I feel no real desire to celebrate my nation today and am both disappointed and disillusioned. So I will take the opportunity to thank God for providing me a nation where, for the time being, I am able to raise my family to know and love the Lord. I thank God for freedom and safety. Perhaps in a week or two I will take some time to celebrate my nation, but not for now. The pain is still too fresh in my mind."
Last year I affirmed God's sovereignty, despite Canada Day falling only a few days after the reading into law of a new bill that guaranteed the rights of homosexuals to marry. And since that day, multitudes of gay Canadian couples have tied the knot. Already Canadians are dealing with the first homosexual divorce cases. Despite this gross violation of God's law, I took comfort in God. "I guess this year my confidence in God has increased and I know that all of these things merely point towards the truth of God's Word. Nations will continue to stray farther and farther from God. The Laws will become increasingly ungodly. Yet through it all, God is ever in control. I can't help but be reminded of Psalm 2. "The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD and against his anointed." But what is God's reaction to this? "He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord holds them in derision." In their burning desire to do evil, the nations only make God laugh. He holds them in derision, knowing that He is supreme and that His purposes will prevail. And that is my comfort on this day."
Much has changed in the last year. Canada has elected a new government after the Liberal Party lost the confidence of parliament and was forced to call a new election. Canadians, finally reacting to the ongoing corruption of the Liberals, elected the Conservative Party and their leader, Stephen Harper, to a minority government. Harper claims to be a believer and the evidence seems to support his claim. To this point he has led the nation well. While he cannot roll back the clock on decades of the slow decline of Canadian morals and beliefs, he is making great strides in attempting to relieve some of the Canadian tax burden and in attempting to increase the accountability of governments. Should he be able to secure a stronger position in the future, it seems certain that he will continue to make good choices on behalf of this nation.
As I reflect this year, I realize again how important it is that I do not place my hope in men. It is foolish to grow too excited or too depressed when thinking about a country's leaders. For, as I suggested last year, it is God who is in control. He was in control when the Liberal Party was elected time after time, and He is in control now that the Liberal Party has been set down in disgrace. And this is where my confidence needs to be. Not in the fact that a Christian has ascended to the highest position in the country, and not that there seems to be no obvious Christian presence among the nation's rulers. Our confidence is that God rules even the mightiest of men, even if they do not submit to this rule. As we learn in the book of Daniel, the "Most High God rules the kingdom of mankind and sets over it whom he will." For now he has given us Stephen Harper. May He extend His grace to this man.


Comments (8)
"this is where my confidence needs to be. Not in the fact that a Christian has ascended to the highest position in the country, and not that there seems to be no obvious Christian presence among the nation's rulers."
Just for the sake of our non Canadian friends who read this blog. The highest position in Canada is not the Prime Minister. I believe it is the Governor General, who represents the head of Canada, Queen Elizabeth II. Technically, when it gets right down to it, Canada is not really a democracy. The Head of State, the Queen, has the right to refuse to pass into Law any bill presented to her. It has only happened once, I believe, when Lord Byng as Governor General, refused to sign a bill and caused a huge kerfuffle and QEII would not likely stand for it happening again. Lest any of our American friends think that this helps prove their system is better, it seems to me that the American revolution is on shakey theological grounds given Romans 13 and I Peter 2. And lest anyone think that I am trying to show off, just remember, I am Canadian - sorry, excuse me, no problem, ... eh?
(How do you get twelve Canadians out of your pool? Ask them to leave!!)
All of that brings me to say that we have great reason to thank God for the freedoms we have, considering the powers that our heads of state possess. It enables us to obey Romans 13:1-7, and not be forced to disobey it on the basis of fidelity to the Scriptures.
"The highest position in Canada is not the Prime Minister. I believe it is the Governor General, who represents the head of Canada, Queen Elizabeth II."
Technically, but we all know she's really little more than a politically correct figurehead.
Psalm 33:13-22 (ESV)
The Lord looks down from heaven;
he sees all the children of man;
[14] from where he sits enthroned he looks out
on all the inhabitants of the earth,
[15] he who fashions the hearts of them all
and observes all their deeds.
[16] The king is not saved by his great army;
a warrior is not delivered by his great strength.
[17] The war horse is a false hope for salvation,
and by its great might it cannot rescue.
[18] Behold, the eye of the Lord is on those who fear him,
on those who hope in his steadfast love,
[19] that he may deliver their soul from death
and keep them alive in famine.
[20] Our soul waits for the Lord;
he is our help and our shield.
[21] For our heart is glad in him,
because we trust in his holy name.
[22] Let your steadfast love, O Lord, be upon us,
even as we hope in you.
Amen.
Blessings to you on this mixed emotional day, Tim.
Proverbs 21:1 tells us
The king's heart is in the hand of the LORD;
he directs it like a watercourse wherever he pleases.
And when God displays his power, laughing at the kings of earth in derision, His hand is not always gentle: Think of Katrina, tsunamis, etc. Like you, Tim, when I think about my own government, I am grateful that our heavenly Father is in control. (Though I won't bother you with details, this has implications in my family history as well.) Thanks for the reminder.
Ken,
The "royal assent" power has always intrigued me, because it is one the monarch (or her representive) still holds. In the UK, this assent has "officially" not been refused since 1707 and the days of Queen Anne, but in reality it was refused a few years ago when MP Tam Dalyell tried to get a bill passed regarding troops in Iraq, which would have affected Crown Prerogative. The BBC story said that the bill died because it did not receive royal assent. Only one story on this ran, and I am surprised. You'd think it would have been shouted from the rooftops.
Me thinks that the Brits actually like having "one final place to go" in the Queen, even though they make a good show of protesting if she says too much publically. But we all know behind the scenes is really where the fun is.
Oops..one more thing, Ken.
The American founding fathers actually thought Romans 13 justified their actions. There is a bit of a syllogism in that passage. The role of government is to be a terror to evildoers. When government ceases to be a terror to evildoers and becomes a terror to the righteous, it loses its legitimacy as a government.
We can argue about that of course, but that was their reasoning.
>
Wouldn't you love to discuss the above with Deitrich Bonhoeffer?
Joel,
I think the argument regarding a government losing its right to govern has merit, but I always get drawn back to the fact that the government of the day when Romans 13 was written was hardly one that never caused terror to the righteous. Anyone can say that a government that does not do what I want it to do is forfeiting its right to govern. But that does not necessitate revolution. The issue seems to be that when laws make it illegal to practise the faith, then the authorities must be resisted. Canada has legalized gay marriage but so far the governors have said that I don't have to marry gay people to each other if it contradicts my faith. But if they say I must, then I disobey the law and suffer the consequences.
Lin,
The Dietrich Bonhoeffer reference is a good retort to my little rant but the resistance to the Nazis in WW II was based upon legalized disobedience to the Gospel. The believing church had no choice but to resist the government because the government was seeking to force disobedience to the faith. I see Bonhoeffer's invovement in the assassination attempt of Hitler akin to anyone who lied to protect Jews. And I compare that to Rahab's lie to the officials of Jericho, which the Bible commends.