Ruined For Anything Else

Aileen and I were once members of a church that, after a few years of existence, began to de-emphasize doctrine. Some of the pastors seemed to reach the conclusion that “doctrine divides” and that the church really just needed to focus on evangelism and on “action.” They seemed to determine that a sound theological foundation held in common was unattainable and unrealistic. Therefore, doctrine should be laid aside and the church should rally around the things we had in common—a desire to reach others with the gospel and a desire to serve other people. It was a bit of a naive strategy, of course, and one that was bound to cause problems. Soon the church began to fracture into camps—those with backgrounds in one Christian tradition began doing things in one way while people from a different Christian background began doing them a different way. For a time chaos reigned. In some small groups members of the church would serve the Lord’s Supper, in others they wouldn’t; in some small groups people were baptizing each other and serving Lord’s Supper to children. There was no standard and eventually the pastors had to step in and intervene. By then, though, it was too late and many of these small groups “defected.” Having created their own theological identity and one that was at odds with that of the pastors, some of these groups left en masse. It was an inevitable result, I think, and one that proved to me that critical importance of doctrine being held in common by members of a church.

I found myself thinking about that church this weekend. I spent a good bit of my time reading the manuscript for Collin Hansen’s Young, Restless, Reformed: A Journalist’s Journey with the New Calvinists, a book that is set to released sometime in the spring. The book discusses some of the resurgence of Reformed theology in our day and does so, in large part, through interviews with some of the pivotal figures in this resurgence. There was one quote by Josh Harris that caught my attention: “Once you’re exposed to [doctrine], you see the richness in it for your own soul, and you’re ruined for anything else.”

This is something I’ve experienced in my own life and something I’ve seen in the lives of other Christians. I once went on a weekend men’s retreat that featured teaching from several local pastors. We heard some interesting messages about serving our wives, about being men of integrity and so on. We had joyful times of worship and lots of time to blow each other away with paintball guns. The thing that has remained in my mind, though, was one of the sermons delivered that weekend. While we had received a steady diet of fairly typical evangelical sermons, one of the pastors stood and delivered what was, in effect, a biblically-grounded expository message. He simply opened up the Bible and explained to us what it meant and how we could apply it to our lives. He gave us real doctrine—true meat instead of mere milk. As we walked from the meeting room to our cabins I could tell there was a buzz running through the crowd of men. They had enjoyed the sermon and had been electrified by it. But they had no category for it. I heard comments like, “I don’t know what that was, but it was amazing! I wish we could hear more teaching like that!” I sat with a small group of men a few minutes later and introduced to them the concept of expositional preaching. Most had never heard of any such thing; neither had they ever enjoyed a sermon like it.

It was a pivotal moment for me. I drove home to me something that the Bible teaches but something I had never really seen before—that true believers want and eventually need to move from milk to meat. Though they may not have a category to describe what is missing from their lives they will feel a restlessness. The Spirit works in them to give them a craving for solid food. And when they take a bite of that food, their eyes light up and they know that they are experiencing something that they were meant to enjoy.

I saw this time and time again. The church was so good at bringing people in through the front doors. They would come in and very often would be saved. Many people were drawn in, became believers, and were baptized. But often they would not last at the church too long. Within a few months or a couple of years they would often step right out the back door. Few left the church and left the faith altogether. Rather, they would leave and head for churches where there was teaching that was more biblical. They would head for churches where the Word was the main thing. They would be drawn to stronger, more biblical teaching, even when they did not know how to express what they needed or what they longed for. Eventually they would find it. Needless to say, Aileen and I felt the same call. Though we stayed some time for the sake of our friends, eventually we, too, had to leave to find a place where the Word was central. And we could never go back.

This takes me back to Josh Harris. Once you’ve been exposed to doctrine you see the richness in it for your own soul and you truly are ruined for anything else. Just as a young child craves solid food, Christians will and must crave the meat of the Word. And once you’ve tasted it, there is no going back.

Comments (16)

1
Anonymous's picture

Well said. It’s the same thing my husband and I have experienced.

2
Anonymous's picture

Amen x 100. This was exactly our situation, nearly 100 percent. And I’m sure there are thousands more out there just like us. Thanks for pin-pointing exactly all the details.

3
Anonymous's picture

Thanks Tim, as a budding preacher who is struggling to find his own voice I appreciate this response. It is difficult in the current climate to stick to preaching the Word with power and authority, but that is where God does his work. Daily I try to be less concerned about having a flashy message or about entertaining people with music and try to focus on the primacy of the Word and the sacraments in feeding the people of God. I do not want to draw people away from one tradition to another because I do not want to contribute to the ‘circulation of the saints’. But at the same time, many people are not hearing the whole message being preached where they are.

Again, thank you for this perspective. It is something I have held as well, but I am not sure if it resonates with those who listen.

4
Anonymous's picture

You articulate well what so many of us have experienced but cannot put in words. I left my old church back at the end of April; it was a scary move, having been in that church for 13 years. It was a strange feeling to walk into a new church the week after leaving the old, and knowing instantly we had found what was missing for so long.

It was especially difficult as I had been so active in the old church; Sunday school teacher, Awana director, worship team musician, office staff member. I stayed because I knew people were watching and I did not want to cause anyone to stumble.

Now, as I encounter people (from the old church) around town who ask where I worship now, I am amazed at how many of them express the desire to leave but feel bound by friendship with the pastor or loyalty to a small group. Though not overtly stated, the old church and its small groups are operating as Berit Kjos described in the “Spirit-Led or Purpose Driven” series (http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/2003/1-purpose.htm) especially parts 3 and 4 in which the dialectic process is described as well as the process for dealing with resisters. How painful to be on the pastor’s staff, and after raising Biblical objections to some changes be told of a couple of other churches at which I might be happier.

I know there are thousands of stories like mine. I am thankful the Lord placed us in a church which has publicly stated it will NEVER be about anything but the solid Word of God.

5
Anonymous's picture

Very well said!

Just curious about the manuscript you referred to and whether it could could be a potentially good gift to those friends and even leaders at churches that lean more towards a seeker sensitive variety? The feedback I’ve received from the few I have had contact with that they truly believe they are giving the people what they “need” in their topical and fluff sermons, but I continue to argue that their “felt needs” are usually not their needs at all. The need for hearing the whole and full Gospel is the basis point that, although I believe is plainly taught in Scripture, is being overlooked by so many churches. So, would this upcoming book argue that it is a legitimate desire of the Christian to hear God’s Word? If not, are you aware of books that make this case that could be tossed to a seeker sensitive sort that would give them something to really think about?

6
Anonymous's picture

That’s a great articulation of the journey I’ve underwent over the past several months. I tried going back. I can’t.

Thanks for sharing.

7
Anonymous's picture

Hey Tim,

I’ve found that the same is true of youth. Most expect a Bible Study to mean that you open up a small book, read a short verse, and then have a book author apply a topic that is related.

Instead, I started opening up the Bible and teaching straight from the text. As the group was composed of international youth from several countries, it opened up some unique discussions, but in the end, it allowed them 2 powerful results. 1: It taught them that Bible Study means using the Bible, not simply an applicational study with a Bible Verse thrown in.2: It taught them how to study the Bible on their own. They learned they didn’t need someone else to teach them what it means, they can go themselves and learn. Yes they still need teachers and others to protect from false doctrine, but they still get to drink the fresh water and never go back to regurgitated water.

8
Anonymous's picture

This is happening at my “Baptist ” church right now. They are shortening our fine pastor’s sermons. He is capable of good exposition, but rarely has time for much of that anymore in either of the two services. I suspect there are old timers asking him to be relevant and topical. Or could it be the young timers? Perhaps it’s that group from the new 9:00 a.m. service who like rock and roll “praise” music? Lots of emoting goin’ on there. hmmmm.

Among other recent changes at the church we now have a Willow Creek affection going on. Two women in leadership positions were sent to Willow Creek for small group training. Now that the entire church is segregated by every age and interest group we could manage to manage, the dire NEED for connecting is, in their minds, to be found in another group.

And Willow Creek literature is available at a discount, suddenly, by signing up with them. (?) Why would a Baptist want to do that…. to be relevant? Perhaps I am not sensitive enough to go there anymore.

And the icing for me and my three teens is that the youth leader decided to lead the elementary grade children through a prayer labyrinth just two weeks ago.

I’m pondering whether I should speak up or just move on quietly to the only other (soon to be only) church in our small town that teaches the Word.

Thanks for this. Your insights are helpful.

9
Anonymous's picture

Great article. Our story would fit right in. Praise God, though, that He led us to a doctrinally strong chuch.

10
Anonymous's picture

Five years ago, I started looking on the web for something more. At first I only found the same, but one night I came across a scathing post about something a crazy pastor named Piper had said. Well, I just had to check out the link. And I ended up listening to a sermon on the Sovereignty of God. My first thought was that he really wasn’t very good at praying. My last thought, after listening to the sermon, was wow…… wow…

There’s nothing like true meat for the true “seeker”.

11
Anonymous's picture

Similar experience to me, 25 and recently went from a mega church to a small reformed baptist church where God is exalted and they aren’t all about numbers. I struggled for a while with rather to leave the mega church or not, I was used to listening to powerful sermons on the net and radio during the week and then going to the service on Sunday to hear practical sermons and watered down Gospel presentations. Not looking back!

12
Anonymous's picture

ah ha! Thank you for providing this brief exposition on exactly what I’ve been experiencing recently. At first I found it weird, as a uni student with loads of reading already, that I constantly desire to read (& listen to) even more loads of “non-school-related” things —teachings on doctrines, expositional preaching, history of the church, etc. …I realize now that it is not so weird, but perhaps even kinda natural. :)

13
Anonymous's picture

This is a bit off topic, but I hope that some time between the article in Christianity Today and the writing of his manuscript, someone explained to Collin Hansen that being a calvinist doesn’t necessarily make you reformed, and that if he wants to give an accurate picture of what it means to be reformed, he can’t do so without including at least some presbyterians.

14
Anonymous's picture

Westminster only ships to the “continental” U.S. AK and HA are outside of where they ship.

Peace to all

MHK

15
Anonymous's picture

Excellent article. If only more people who call themselves Christians understand the treasure in delving deep into doctrine instead of just pushing for a watered-down seeker friendly discussion.

16
Anonymous's picture

Thanks for putting these thoughts in a clear presentation. That is exactly how I feel, and I am relieved to hear it expressed in words by somebody else. Almost everything at my church, even adult Sunday School classes, is led on an introductory level. We do not have expository sermons there either. I have been fed meat through going deeper at an independent Bible Study, and I wish it was an experience that is available at my church. Why can’t Sunday School be taught on different levels like college courses? The 100 level, 200 level, etc.