- RSS FeedSubscribe
- « Previous PostA La Carte (6/12)
- Next Post »TDoSD: The First Endorsement
The Beautiful Letdown
- 06/12/07
- 6
Road hockey is a long-standing Canadian tradition--so much so that we invented the word "shinny" to describe the informal games that are played on driveways, roads and parking lots across the nation. It seems that today's youth generally prefers to play hockey on the Playstation and it is becoming more and more rare to see panting kids, huffing and puffing up the road with frozen cheeks, frozen noses and missing teeth. And the nation is worse for it. Times have changed. But I digress.
When I was in grade school I knew that any self-respecting boy had to have a hockey stick at school throughout the duration of the school year. Every recess and lunch break afforded us the opportunity to head outdoors, even if it was just for fifteen or twenty minutes, to play a bit of pick-up hockey. Of course the difficultly always arose that we needed to divide into teams. Now there were two methods of doing this. The first was an egalitarian method where all the sticks were thrown into a pile and a blindfolded person (actually, the blindfold was usually just a "touque" (another Canadian word, this one meaning "hat") pulled over the person's eyes) would divide them into two groups by simpling rifling the sticks into two equal piles. The group your stick was in defined which team you would play for. This method was quick and easy but could lead to imbalanced teams.
The second method was the skill-based method where two captains would be quickly chosen and they would pick their teams as they saw fit. Naturally the most-skilled players were picked first and the least-skilled were picked last. While I was never a standout player, it was blessedly rare for me to be the last guy picked. Last guy picked was, as you know, a position of shame and embarrassment and was reserved only for the most clumsy, least-athletic guy in the class. Of course the least-athletic guy was also considered the class loser. Popularity in grade school was largely determined by one's ability to succeed in sports. Those who simply did not have the coordination and skill to do well in sports ranked at the very bottom of the pecking order.
As I reminisce about my childhood I become profoundly thankful that God didn't use either of these methods to choose a people for Himself. The Bible tells us that God predestined to salvation those who would believe in Him. While He has not seen fit to reveal exactly how He chose who would be among the elect and who would not, we do have some ideas about how He did not go about this.
God did not sort people into a pile, determine how many he wanted to spend eternity in heaven with Him, and then go through them and count them off like a gym teacher. "1, 2, 3, 4, 5, in! 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, in!" We know this is not the way He acted because in the first verses of Ephesians Paul tells us that we were predestined "according to the purpose of his will, to the praise of his glorious grace." It was not mere statistics or chance that we were saved and there was nothing arbitrary about it. Rather, we were saved by an act of God's will and were saved for His glory. We also know that God did not choose people based on what they had to offer Him. He did not choose us based on our love for Him, our desire to be His children or on the skill we could exhibit in serving or worshiping Him. Paul illustrates this in the letter to the Romans. Writing about Jacob and Esau he tells us that God announced His decision concerning which of the twins would love Him before they were even born so that "God's purpose in election might stand: not by works but by him who calls." (Romans 9:11-12)
A few years ago Jon Foreman of the band Switchfoot wrote a song called "The Beautiful Letdown" in which he describes the church. "We are a beautiful letdown, painfully uncool, the church of the dropouts the losers the sinners the failures and the fools." I love those words. Often when I begin to feel like I have something to offer God or somehow that I have done something to deserve God's love, those words will spring to mind. The church is not made up of the best of people--the most intelligent, the most athletic, the coolest, the funniest, the most-skilled or the ones who have the most to offer. No, the church is made of what the world perceives to be dropouts, losers, sinners, failures and fools. It is made up of fools who have been made wise by God so that we can trust in Divine wisdom rather than the wisdom of this world. It is made of those who have left behind careers, dreams and riches to seek after God. It is made up of people who are empowered by God Himself so that He can live life in and through them. It is made up of those to whom God has given grace to see that success in His eyes is often failure in the world's.
God has chosen a people for Himself, and thanks be to Him, He has done so using Divine wisdom that transcends any human mind. We do not know on what basis He chose us, but we do know why we were chosen. He set us apart to bring glory and honor to Him, both here on earth and for eternity in heaven. Or as Ephesians puts it, we were predestined "in order that we, who were the first to hope in Christ, might be for the praise of his glory." What a joy and honor it is to praise Him for His wisdom, knowing that our obedience brings glory to His name. God can be glorified in and through me! And through His power, He will be.



Comments (6)
If God did not choose me arbitrarily, but rather picked me because I am a loser - a "beautiful letdown, painfully uncool ... a dropout ... a loser...a failure...a fool - then it appears to me that God has chosen me because of some inherent quality within me. Far from being sovereignly chosen, I appear now to have a hand in his chosing, especially since loserdom is often self-imposed and further perpetuated by self-choice. In short, does my choosing to become a loser force His sovereign hand? That is certainly the implication of, inter alia, Foreman's song.
How is it consistent to argue that God does not choose based on any inherent quality within us, but then to say that we are chosen because of the inner loser within us?
And if it were true that God is predisposed to choose geeks, dorks, and losers, should I veer my children in that direction? Is the measure of good Christian parenting determined by how successful I am in restraining my child's good looks, class popularity, massive intelligence and street smarts, ambition and desire for greatness, and instead determined by how well I've been able to mold him into a total loser (but one with the qualities that God seems predisposed to choosing)?
Cutting Truth: you couldn't have twisted Tim's words any better.
God doesn't choose or accept anyone on the basis of their performance; if anything, He chooses despite it. God's doesn't accept us, like Tim said, because we have "the most to offer"; in fact, it's the opposite. We have nothing to offer. In Ephesians 2:1-3, Paul makes it clear that we were dead in trespasses and sins, walking in the course of the world and in the will of the adversary, pursuing and fulfilling the lusts of our flesh and of our minds, the objects of God's wrath. Then comes the gospel of God's merciful intervention . . . "But God." Of these two words, James Boice said, "May I put it quite simply? If you understand those two words -- 'but God' -- they will save your soul. If you recall them daily and live by them, they will transform your life completely." Through Christ and with Christ, we are now made alive, raised, and seated in the heavenly realm. All of our boasting is in Him.
Thanks, Tim, for this essay. Here in the USA, it was baseball or basketball. I was often the last one picked.
Yes, thank God that he doesn't see as people see, and doesn't choose as people choose.
"How is it consistent to argue that God does not choose based on any inherent quality within us, but then to say that we are chosen because of the inner loser within us?"
Nowhere did I say that we are chosen because we are losers. If anything I said we are chosen despite being losers...
A "Beautiful Letdown." How true and ironic this phrase is. How can a letdown be beautiful? As I recall, most of those picked last were anything but beautiful. The ones that were picked on, always. But, not my point.
Even the most athletic is a "letdown" in the eyes of the Lord without the redemption of Christ. We can be the fastest, the smartest, the richest, the most "successful," and it still would not matter. We are still a letdown as compared to what we were created to be. This also implies that losers, as defined by the world, is not defined the same by the Lord, for we are all losers, outside of Christ.
I often think of Isaiah 41:14 where the Lord says,
"Do not be afraid, O worm Jacob,
O little Israel,
for I myself will help you," declares the LORD,
your Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel."
In spite of being but a helpless, sin-filled worm, God in His abundant mercy chose to save me--not because of anything He saw within me, but solely for His own good pleasure. I find myself surprised at times at the wonder of such a God. "WHY?"...I honestly have no idea. But that's okay with me. I don't question God. Instead, in the words of Jon Foreman,
"I will carry a cross and a song
Where I don't belong
I don't belong."