King's Cross

Tim Keller Kings CrossTim Keller’s career as an author has been rather unusual. Ministries of Mercy, his first book, was published in 1997. It was 11 years before he wrote his second book, The Reason for God, a title that rocketed right onto the New York Times list of bestsellers. Since then he has averaged more than a book a year and each of those titles has garnered a lot of acclaim; within just a few years Keller has established himself as one of the most significant Christian authors. New for 2011 is Redeemer, a publishing imprint with Dutton (which in turn is an imprint of Penguin Publishing) and the first book published under that banner: King’s Cross: The Story of the World in the Life of Jesus.

This is a book about Jesus—Jesus as he is portrayed in the Gospel of Mark. Keller says, “It is an extended meditation on the historical Christian premise that Jesus’s life, death, and resurrection form the central event of cosmic and human history as well as the central organizing principle of the world—and how we fit into it—is most clearly understood through a careful, direct look at the story of Jesus. My purpose here is to try to show, through his words and actions, how beautifully his life makes sense of ours.” Understand Jesus and you will understand the world: that is the central premise of the book.

King’s Cross is based upon a series Keller preached on Mark and the expository tone and structure remains. And yet somehow reading this book does not feel like reading sermons—it feels like meditation upon a text. Its style is pure Keller, probably closest to The Prodigal God, though certainly there are similarities with his other titles as well. This is not an exposition of the entire text of Mark, but rather an exposition of some of the more significant moments. And in that way it reads like a biography of Jesus, an account of his life, his death, his meaning, his purpose. While Keller inevitably turns to the parallel accounts of Jesus in the other gospel, his central focus remains Mark.

As you might expect, the structure of King’s Cross mirrors the structure of the Gospel—the first half is dedicated to Jesus’ life while the second half is dedicated to his death and resurrection. Most of the chapters are similar lengths and the writing style is geared very much for the layperson, and perhaps especially for a person with little theological background. And this is what Keller does so well—speak to unbelievers or to new believers. This is a book you could hand to just about anyone as a means of introducing that person to Jesus—to who he is and to what he has done.

One reviewer has said that this is the book where Tim Keller hits his stride as an author. I don’t see it quite like that; this book is very consistent with Keller’s previous titles and, at least in my assessment, does not represent a great leap forward. And I mean this as a compliment rather than an insult. I think he has already hit his stride. This is a good book offering a broad look at the Gospel of Mark. It draws the reader to the cross, to the great work of atonement accomplished there. Christ is the focus of every chapter, his work the thread that leads the reader from the first chapter to the last. This is a commentary for all of us, an exposition that is a joy to read.

Whether you read it devotionally at a pace of a chapter a day or whether you read it in a couple of sittings, King’s Cross will prove beneficial to you. It’s the Gospel of Mark laid out in plain language, explained in contemporary terms and applied to life. And that’s what good exposition is all about.

You can buy it at Westminster Books or Amazon:

Comments (15)

1
Anonymous's picture

Thanks Tim. I’m almost finished with it. It is vintage Keller and a must read for anyone who wants to better understand the trajectory of Mark’s Gospel. I think more of my book is underlined than not.

2
Anonymous's picture

Just a comment on today’s Youtube link: I did not find it amusing in any way. Music, even satirical in nature, that is irreverant to police officers and refers to them as “pigs” is offensive and not in keeping with what we are called to as followers of Christ. This wordly junk is not worthy of this fine website that I look to so often for wisdom and encouragment in the faith. I want to be proud to continue to recommend it (as I often do) to others who are seeking the same thing, and shudder to think what a friend of mine whose husband is a police officer would have thought if today had been her first visit to the website. And perhaps you were unaware, but there is an ad pop-up linked to this video is soft-porn in nature. Ugh.

3
Anonymous's picture

A note on your comment on Tim’s “career as an author” and the gap between his first book and his current output. His first book was his doctoral thesis and at least in that sense isn’t directly connected with his recent output. Those are more closely related to his current ministry and the themes he has developed in his preaching. You have done an excellent job in capturing the essence of this latest offering. I find your comments that it continues his current string of strong offerings and that it is probably closest to “The Prodigal God” both well observed.

4
Anonymous's picture

I have listened and enjoyed many of his sermons, unfortunately never had the chance to read one of his books. What are your comments on this article?

http://apprising.org/2011/03/08/5-reasons-to-be-cautious-with-tim-keller…

5
Anonymous's picture

Tommie,

I’d take anything “Ken Silva” has with a large grain of salt, ok maybe a couple 50 pound bags of it…

http://apprisingkensilva.wordpress.com/2010/04/13/who-is-ken-silva/

Oh the joy of the anonimity of the internet.

6
Anonymous's picture

Ken criticizes Tim Keller for promoting “Roman Catholic mysticism”, but that doesn’t stop Ken from heavily referencing A.W. Tozer, a mystic himself who found much to commend Catholic mystics.

Most of Ken’s other criticisms of Keller are just as weak.

7
Anonymous's picture

I assume that you read the posts at 5pt.salt and didn’t like what was said. Just wondered why you didn’t post here. Seems like a fair evaluation from the other side would help others discern.Thanks

8
Anonymous's picture

Thought it was kind of weird when Keller said “that Jesus lived like Mother Teresa” in the MSNBC interview….didn’t know Jesus has her in mind as a role model.

9
Anonymous's picture

If you would like a response to the 5 point crtique of Tim Keller I’ll give that a try.

1) I’m not familiar with Adele Calhoun’s “Spiritual Disciplines”. On this I must pass.

2) Hard for me to see what is wrong about Christianity being attractive to unregenerates and welcoming unbelievers to worship with believers? Can you or anyone expalin why I should?

3) The Roman Catholic mysticism he refers to is a series of lectures on Christian meditation. I was there for them and they have nothing to do with Roman Catholic mysticism. Christian meditation is a prayer technique, nothing more.

4) Same as the above under a different title.

5) True. Tim does not believe in YEC.

10
Anonymous's picture

And as a follow up to 2). He critiques Tim’s belief in the missional orientation of his church. Read it for yourself. He mischaracterizes that orientation and builds a critique on those mischaracterizations. Much ado about nothing IMHO.

11
Anonymous's picture

And a final post on the above. The mischaracterization that Mr. Silva engages in is claiming that the missional orientation Tim Keller speaks about equates with “emergent church” theology. This is simply not true. Dr. Keller does not compromise theologically on the Gospel, sin, the law or grace.

The missional orientation of Tim’s church refers to the understanding that today’s post-modern church attendee does not have any religious background. That makes it the church’s mission to explain not only the nuances of Christian thought but to explore the presuppositions that its attendees bring with them. Only by fully explaining both Christian theology and post-modern thought can people come to understand God and accept and Christ.

12
Anonymous's picture

The unregenerate are not attracted to the church by the church because the Scriptures say they(the world) hate Christ and us. It is only by the Spirit .Church is for the believer as 1Co.14-23-25 says. The sheep are to be fed there and if an unregenerate stumbles in he may hear something and be converted. Too much time is spent trying to appeal to the goats. The sheep are to be fed and then they are to go out and preach to the goats and if they seem to be interested then we are to bring them in to hear the Word.Using New Age authors and Mother Theresa to make a case for anything related to Christianity is dangerous.Prayer does not need to be a method but heartfelt. There are many authors who talk of the dangers of using comtemplative methods.I say we just do what the Scriptures say and let God do what He does and that is to save sinners.Preach the word as Paul told Timothy.Too much confusion in the neo-reformed chuches.Anyway, I humbly submit this and thank you for listening.

13
Anonymous's picture

Those being called need a place to be called to, scripture preached to them and their questions answered. That is what is offered. There is nothing remotely new age or neo-reformed about Tim Keller or his church and the Mother Theresa comment is being taken out of context. I can tell you that Tim Keller is as true to Scrfipture as anyone I know of. Christian meditation was offered only as a suggestion to those who might be interested and is not central to the church or offered in a sermon. You’re entitled to your opinion about it.

14
Anonymous's picture

So basicly Tim does not believe in the 6 days creation but, still believes God created. And he is missrepesented by the Ken in the other 4 points.

(I didn’t know Tozer supported the Mystic’s)

15
Anonymous's picture

Tommie. Yes. Well put.