Quote - You Might Be Emergent If...

Have you ever wondered if you are emergent? I know I have! Here is Kevin DeYoung, co-author of Why We’re Not Emergent (By Two Guys Who Should Be) on how you might know if you are emergent…


After reading nearly five thousand pages of emerging-church literature, I have no doubt that the emerging church, while loosely defined and far from uniform, can be described and critiqued as a diverse, but recognizable, movement. You might be an emergent Christian: if you listen to U2, Moby, and Johnny Cash’s Hurt (sometimes in church), use sermon illustrations from The Sopranos, drink lattes in the afternoon and Guinness in the evenings, and always use a Mac; if your reading list consists primarily of Stanley Hauerwas, Henri Nouwen, N. T. Wright, Stan Grenz, Dallas Willard, Brennan Manning, Jim Wallis, Frederick Buechner, David Bosch, John Howard Yoder, Wendell Berry, Nancy Murphy, John Franke, Walter Winks and Lesslie Newbigin (not to mention McLaren, Pagitt, Bell, etc.) and your sparring partners include D. A. Carson, John Calvin, Martyn Lloyd-Jones, and Wayne Grudem; if your idea of quintessential Christian discipleship is Mother Teresa, Martin Luther King Jr., Nelson Mandela, or Desmond Tutu; if you don’t like George W. Bush or institutions or big business or capitalism or Left Behind Christianity; if your political concerns are poverty, AIDS, imperialism, war-mongering, CEO salaries, consumerism, global warming, racism, and oppression and not so much abortion and gay marriage; if you are into bohemian, goth, rave, or indie; if you talk about the myth of redemptive violence and the myth of certainty; if you lie awake at night having nightmares about all the ways modernism has ruined your life; if you love the Bible as a beautiful, inspiring collection of works that lead us into the mystery of God but is not inerrant; if you search for truth but aren’t sure it can be found; if you’ve ever been to a church with prayer labyrinths, candles, Play-Doh, chalk-drawings, couches, or beanbags (your youth group doesn’t count); if you loathe words like linear, propositional, rational, machine, and hierarchy and use words like ancient-future, jazz, mosaic, matrix, missional, vintage, and dance; if you grew up in a very conservative Christian home that in retrospect seems legalistic, naive, and rigid; if you support women in all levels of ministry, prioritize urban over suburban, and like your theology narrative instead of systematic; if you disbelieve in any sacred-secular divide; if you want to be the church and not just go to church; if you long for a community that is relational, tribal, and primal like a river or a garden; if you believe doctrine gets in the way of an interactive relationship with Jesus; if you believe who goes to hell is no one’s business and no one may be there anyway; if you believe salvation has a little to do with atoning for guilt and a lot to do with bringing the whole creation back into shalom with its Maker; if you believe following Jesus is not believing the right things but living the right way; if it really bugs you when people talk about going to heaven instead of heaven coming to us; if you disdain monological, didactic preaching; if you use the word “story” in all your propositions about postmodernism—if all or most of this tortuously long sentence describes you, then you might be an emergent Christian.

Comments (45)

1
Anonymous's picture

Hey Challies,

Hurg. History really does repeat. It seems to me more and more that the contemporary Evangelical church is treading the same path already taken by the mainline denominations — jettisoning much of historic Christianity, pursuing secular messiahs and avoiding sin, the Cross and so much else in pursuit of a chimerical “relevance.” They speak in postmodern diction, but the impulse is the same. Obviously there are degrees of mushiness, but I think the general trend in Evangelicalism is away from Orthodoxy and toward a Biblically-ignorant, gelded Christianity.

They’ll point to all the good works they’re doing, and their “relevance” in the wider community. So did the Unitarians. So did the Episcopalians. So do the Metropolitan Church of Christ folks.

Hey, how’s that working out for the Mainliners?

Well, we’ve performed more than one salvage operation in American Christianity, I guess we’ll just have to be prepared in fifteen years for another one.

2
Anonymous's picture

That’s pretty good.

3
Anonymous's picture

This is the most beautiful post I’ve read on your site, Tim, even if you publish it in irony. Thanks for making me smile today.

(Now, where’s my latt…?)

Warmly,

Scott

4
Anonymous's picture

This comment is probably unnecessary, but I certainly hope that it isn’t implied that *all* of these things are bad. At the very least, I hope that I can read Wendell Berry and make fun of Left Behind while still comfortably remaining un-emergent. : )

5
Anonymous's picture

Oh good, I’m not very emergent at all. I do drink lattes and read Wendell Berry, though. I can recommend both, in moderation. ;-)

I enjoyed your review of the Reformed book; I may have to check it out. It fits with my experience, too. Most of the young people I know gravitate towards stronger doctrine—and tradition too, though that’s a different debate.

6
Anonymous's picture

Even from my somewhat limited knowledge of the emergent movement, this seems very accurate to me! Of course, some are stereotypes, and some I identify with (and I’m definitely not emergent). But I think it’s a helpful, humorous list of indicators. I think the emergent church categorizes evangelicals in much the same manner - in fact, I seem to have read much more about that. So it’s interesting to read it in the other direction for once.

7
Anonymous's picture

Uh-oh. I don’t believe in any in any sacred-secular divide. On the bright side, though, Guinness is the most putrid, vile sewage I’ve ever tasted. And I’m holding back my true feelings so I won’t have to delete my own comment.

8
Anonymous's picture

Tim,

What a crazy post! Very interesting though. I have aspects of the emergent church movement within my calling as I plant a new church, but I am fully rooted in my reformed theology and believe that the two can coexist in harmony and all for the glory and honor of God.

I seek not to provide another consumerism arena, but instead to try and engage twentysomethings in a way that reveals God’s redemptive plan in a relevant way using the power of Christ’s gospel and letting God be the spotlight. Music, lattes, pop culture and even Dallas Willard’s writings can be used to unify generations and reveal the sovereign nature of God to the world today. At least that is what I believe and the direction I feel God is leading me in ministry. I pray that others will learn to embrace change and realize that even though I think Intelligencer is 100% correct in that history does repeat itself (in the church), we don’t have to stand by idly and wait for the next move of God—it’s closer than some of us think and it will take new sight and new senses to embrace it with wisdom and passion as the Christ of yesterday, today, and tomorrow comes to share his saving grace with his kingdom.

9
Anonymous's picture

if you love the Bible as a beautiful, inspiring collection of works that lead us into the mystery of God but is not inerrant”

This is scary. This is the foundation of God’s kingdom, and His people, with Christ as our Cornerstone.

I do believe the ECM may vary on this one. Some do hold to the Bible as God’s Word, and truth, and that it is vital for Christians to be taught. And some may think as you stated here, and that would have me question their conversion as being genuine.

10
Anonymous's picture

Hilarious post! I was chuckling as I read the whole thing but I don’t think the sentence was emergent , it had an ending!! One thing thing too, I know I’m not emergent , my bookshelf is full of J M , as in John MacArthur , 100% anti-emergent!!

11
Anonymous's picture

Oooh! I just love personality tests. Turns out I’m about as emergent as John MacArthur.

12
Anonymous's picture

I’m hoping to contrast this with my own post as to what a new reformed mentality is like. For example, instead of Maclaren, we would read C.J. Mahaney, instead of Huerwas, D.A. Carson, instead of latte’s, clove cigarettes (yes it’s a thing at the Reformed Baptist place I go to, I like tea myself), and instead of Rob Bell, Mark Driscoll!!!!!! I’m sure I’ll finish this at my blog at some point.

13
Anonymous's picture

Here’s a blog post by Justin Taylor regarding emerging pastor Dan Kimball’s post about the book “Why We’re Not Emergent”.

http://theologica.blogspot.com/2008/03/kimball-on-why-were-not-emergent.html

14
Anonymous's picture

Tim, as I read this post, I found myself nodding in agreement with some portions, while shaking my head in disbelief at others. I have never considered myself emergent, and never will. However, I do believe many in Christendom have focused too much on abortion and gay marriage in their political leanings and not enough on poverty, or AIDS, or many other topics. I do not, however, care for the “Left Behind” series (although I read them just to find out firsthand what all the hub-bub was about). I drink lattes but not Guiness, U2 but not Moby. I am becoming more and more Reformed in my theology, but I attend a non-denominational church that teaches the inerrant Word of God verse-by-verse. I love hymns, but prefer to hear them through an amplifier than a pipe organ. I guess I’m kind of an evangelical prairie dog: popping my head up to see what’s going on in the world, yet pulling it back down into the safety that is the undergirding beneath.

15
Anonymous's picture

Oh, and I wrote this on a Mac. ;)

16
Anonymous's picture

What about if you insanely like U2?

17
Anonymous's picture

I figure I’m about 1/4th emergent. But don’t worry I only agree with the good statements in there.

18
Anonymous's picture

There should be something in there about the ability to get a book published despite having average writing skills. When I read some emergent blogs (missing capital letters aside) I have to think these guys have REALLY good editors at their disposal. Pagitt, Kimball and Oestricher are just a few examples. In contrast, I read Challies and Taylor, and I’m fairly certain they’re “authentic” because their blogs are well-written rather than some rambling, angst-filled mind dumps.

19
Anonymous's picture

haha. i think i’m about 1/4 emergent, too… i definitely think that some of those things are less about being emergent than being a twentysomething christian today. as for which is influencing which, it’s probably some of both (for better or worse).

20
Anonymous's picture

I remember something similar in picture format appearing at Purgatorio

http://purgatorio1.blogspot.com/2005/11/you-might-be-emerging-if.html

21
Anonymous's picture

I wasn’t sure I really qualified until I read the last sentence!

22
Anonymous's picture

I do have a budding taste for jazz and the blues, though mainly due to influence from Carl Trueman and H.R. Rookmaaker. I bear the label “Christian” the most, but if I would bear any other label, it would be “Calvinist.” Calvin’s second volume of letters shows a depth toward the Lord’s Supper as a means for unity of the church and expository preaching that no quasi sacerdotalist in the emergent movement can match.

Having said that, because I am actually a child of the postmodern generation, and I am a member of a denomination, the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA), that sometimes ebbs and flows in trends of the times in small ways, it would probably be fair to slap the labels “postmodern” or “emergent” on me. I do think it is important to draw out Christians intermingled with the bad trappings of the emergent church movement and move these Christians toward the solid gold standards of Reformed Protestant tradition - Luther, Calvin, Tyndale, et al. They will not be disappointed.

23
Anonymous's picture

That was quite possibly the best blog post I have ever read!

24
Anonymous's picture

Tim,

That was just unhelpful. I mean, I didn’t find it at all interesting or edifying. I mean, wow wow wow wow.

You bible believing conservative…no wonder all those Jesus-loving heathens don’t like your church…:)

Seriously, that was great, but by the end I was thinking “Breathe man, breathe!!”

25
Anonymous's picture

Thanks, JMark… I was going to link to that post as well but you saved me the trouble of figuring out all that a=href business.

So, what if I like Guinness, my pastor uses sermon illustrations from the NCAA playoffs AND the Sopranos, The Divine Conspiracy changed my life, Wendell Berry teaches at the school just up the street from me, I don’t like big business or “Left-Behind” Christianity (ugh), my political concerns include poverty and stewardship of the environment, I disbelieve the sacred-secular divide, my church focuses on the urban rather than the suburban…

BUT

I’m reformed.

Does that last bit cancel out all the other things?

26
Anonymous's picture

Laura,

Your on the edge of a slippery slope. I’d get all the candles out of your house NOW. Otherwise…

Is this like carbon credits? Give your negative labrynth credits to John McArthur because he’s way safe, so that the accounting shows you as more reformed than you normally could claim and you’ll be far enough above the line that you can keep your U2 albums…

27
Anonymous's picture

I agree with Carissa that a lot of those things seem to characterize twenty-something Christians in general, not just emergents… but it’s still great.

28
Anonymous's picture

In honor of my staunchly anti-modernistic, super-Calvinist, ultra inclusive hymnody infused, evangelically juiced, brainy and beloved brother from the Great White North (who puts the “fun” in “fundamentalist”!), I am currently playing Rush at outrageously high degrees on my computer speakers. Who says they can’t import anything good from Canada? (Okay, Gretzsky too.) C’mon, bring out your lighters; sing it loud and sing it proud! “Closer to the heart, closer to the HEART …” 8-P

Happy April, from a fool,Your appreciative (Reformed and always Reforming) brother in Christ,Rick

29
Anonymous's picture

Some of my own…you may be emerging if…

1. You love Jesus but hate what Paul has done with his teachings.

2. You pray the rosary even if you aren’t a Catholic.

3. You listen to Bruce Springsteen to receive sacramental grace.

4. You have a coexist bumper sticker on your fuel efficient, foreign vehicle.

5. You use phrases like “platonic dualism” with your church members. Actually, you don’t believe in church membership; you just choose to live in covenant community.

30
Anonymous's picture

I think U2 sucks and I really wish people would stop thinking they are the best band ever. I like radiohead but I really wish they would sing about Jesus. I don’t watch the Sopranos……but I do watch Seinfeld, I do drink lattes, but usually never in the afternoon and I love Guiness but it is too expensive for me, and I don’t know how to use a Mac; I love reading N. T. Wright but I also need a good dose of John Stott, Michael Green, John MacArthur and John Piper. Lloyd-Jones and Calvin are my homeboys; my idea of quintessential Christian discipleship is the apostle Paul and that dude who plays guitar at my church; I don’t know much about George Bush except for the youtube videos I’ve seen of him mess up his speeches. I do not like Left Behind Christianity; I think poverty, AIDS, CEO salaries, consumerism, global warming, racism, and oppression are political concerns but abortion makes me ill and my heart breaks for homosexuals; I think I would describe myself as rather bohemian; I am certain that the myth of certainty is a myth; My parents are modern and I love them; I love the Bible as a beautiful, inspiring collection of works that lead us into the mystery of God and is inerrant (God wrote it); I search for truth and often get it wrong but I know I have many important things right, the Bible tells me so; I got lost in a labyrinth; I think the dream of God is a good way of describing the Kingdom of God but it remains only a way of explaining it; I grew up in a very conservative Christian home and am happy about it; I believe dudes and girls are equal…….but they do have different roles; I am sympathetic with those who disbelieve in any sacred-secular divide as long as they aren’t excusing laziness; I want to be the church and go to church; I long for an inclusive community of those who are represented by Christ alone….none of that river hoogly; My election brought me very close to Jesus; Hell is going to happen (whether it has real fire or not it is still HELL), no use denying it now; I believe salvation is from sin, evil and death and is remedied by the victorious and penal substitutionary death of Christ and his resurrection on the third day. I believe Christians need to talk about the Kingdom of God. I think Jesus told us to believe in Jesus; I think people should talk about heaven coming to us; Paul Martin’s preaching rocks hard; ‘Story’ is so pass - and Jonathan Edwards writes beautiful prose.

31
Anonymous's picture

Hey, I like U2 before I had met a Christian, much less become one. And I have used a Mac since before you were in high school! Just because people are FINALLY awakening to the reality of their techno-cultural poverty and switching to the Light doesn’t mean we are emergent!

Other than that, I liked your post, young feller. There’s poetry in those jeans.

Dan

32
Anonymous's picture

In this videoDr. Ravi Zacharias says “The emerging church is not really new. Some of its precepts started in the garden of eden when the serpent said, ‘Did God really say this?’”

I agree with first commenter… History repeats itself.

33
Anonymous's picture

I thank God that I’m not emergent. That’s a pretty good summary. God bless.

34
Anonymous's picture

I am far from an ‘emergent soul’ but in recent years, my church has been delving deeper into the depths of this movement with the aforementioned prayer labyrinths, candles, and play-doh, chanting/singing monastery tunes, and recess time during a sunday morning worship service. All of that is basically irrelevant compared to the real issues at hand, however: a lack of dependence and cherishing of God’s Word and an inability or reluctance to preach the whole counsel of God. I hope that others in a similar predicament will continue to stand firm and pray.

35
Anonymous's picture

While I’m uncomfortable with some of these to be sure, I feel like a good many of them can be applied to the young, missional reformed movement just as effectively. Certainly there are some where we disagree, but in my experience the missional (think Mars Hill Seattle or Redeemer Presbyterian) culture is quite similar to the stereotypes about the Emergent Village culture. Most my friends are reformed but we agree on the point about political interests, we’d also enjoy some of the authors you referenced, though we also love a good sermon by Piper or Mahaney. And in terms of music, drinking, etc. I’m totally there with them.

Just a thought - perhaps we ought to think of the whole emergent/reformed split as more of an X/Y plane than a simple continuum? Like one plane would be understanding of the atonement and the other would be understanding of the kingdom? I know I find myself torn as I read these sort of statements - like some of them make me enormously uncomfortable and others I’m like “Heck yeah!” Like I’m totally with a guy like MacArthur on the atonement but not at all on the kingdom. Likewise, I like lots of McLaren’s ideas about the kingdom but his ideas about the atonement scare me.

I dunno… It’s definitely a funny post. It’s made me think a bit more about some of the issues, too.

36
Anonymous's picture

I actually thought this was hillarious!Thanks for posting it!

37
Anonymous's picture

well said jake!

38
Anonymous's picture

Great post. Humor and a point in the same paragraph. I’m glad I stopped by. I thought I was the only guy who thought atonement was still important.

God Bless

39
Anonymous's picture

Hey Tim -

I was just wondering if you had ever heard of Vince Antonucci. He just wrote a book called “I Became a Christian and All I Got Was This Lousy T Shirt”. He’s also got a blog that (I guess?) is pretty popular. I didn’t know a whole lot about him, but another Christian guy I work with loaned me his copy of the book. I’m about halfway through it right now, and not really knowing much about this guy (or really much about the Emergent Church to be honest) I’m assuming that he is of the Emergent bent. And while the vacation story at the beginning of the book was actually laugh-out-loud funny, I’ve actually been rather put off at how he tries to use humor throughout the book to “poke fun at” many Biblical characters and even God at times. He seems like he tries a little too hard to be hip-hop-here-and-now, cool/funny. I’ve only heard a couple of clips from Rob Bell and I thought the same thing. I did notice a post on Vince’s site earlier in the week where he stated that he wasn’t really into theology, and I thought, “What!? How can you be a pastor and ‘not be into theology’?” Is this really what the “modern church” is moving toward? I’m all for reaching out to the unchurched, and it would appear to be what the Emergent Church is good at, but if you are going to feed the spiritually impoverished, shouldn’t you take more than bite-sized candy bars? This concerns me greatly.

40
Anonymous's picture

if all or most of this tortuously long sentence describes you, then you might be an emergent Christian.”

You had me worried there for a minute. Glad to know if only some describes you than you probably aren’t emergent. Phew.

41
Anonymous's picture

Just thought you might want to know, it’s spelled “NANCEY Murphy,” with an E. If you’re going to make fun of a distinguished philosopher, I’d suggest you at least spell her name right. :)

42
Anonymous's picture

Well, we’ve performed more than one salvage operation in American Christianity, I guess we’ll just have to be prepared in fifteen years for another one. — Intelligencer

Just beware your salvage operation doesn’t end up going just as far in the other direction. When the 19th Century Social Gospel movement became a Gospel without personal salvation (only social consciousness), the “salvage operation” was Fundamentalism, a Gospel of Personal Salvation and Only Personal Salvation.

I’ve experienced the fruits of both, and they’re not pretty. Both out of balance, just in opposite directions.

43
Anonymous's picture

Ha, this is very funny. I just dread to think of all those anti-emergents who fit the inverse description: fanboys of George W. Bush and institutions and big business or capitalism and Left Behind Christianity but unconcerned about poverty, AIDS, imperialism, war-mongering, CEO salaries, consumerism, global warming, racism, and oppression; believe in inerrancy but don’t love the Bible or perceive it has any literary beauty, or fails to inspire us into the mystery of God; etc; not to mention yet to discover the joys of coffee or Guinness! Actually, if this is the criteria for having to choose, sign me up as emergent straight away (oh, that’s right, it’s a conversation, so there’s nowhere to sign).

44
Anonymous's picture

Emergent is the new incarnation of Neo-Orthodoxy. They are the descendants with newer, hipper footwear (instead of wingtips, they’re wearing Crocs).

Re-read Schaeffer’s “the Church at the end of the 20th Century” and you will see that he predicted this in 1970. In their desire for cultural relevance, declarative Truth is sacrificed for “understanding the current conversation.”

We are either on the cusp of a great revival or a great down-grade in the modern church. I pray for revival.

45
Anonymous's picture

Just beware your salvage operation doesn’t end up going just as far in the other direction”

I agree. :) That’s what I love about Reformed Christianity, and why I’ll always have a home there. It avoids the perils of both Pietism and the Social Gospel. It’s the church where I’ve found both active involvement in the culture and a vibrant faith in God. (Though I imagine I’m preaching to the converted in this forum.) :)