Best Commentaries on the Pastoral Epistles

The EBTC is a relatively new series that is relying on some prominent scholars. Köstenberger is well regarded among conservative scholars and has provided this commentary on the pastoral epistles.

This volume in the always-excellent PNTC came too late to be evaluated for the commentaries on the commentaries. But I have no doubt it will soon prove a top pick for many of them.

D.A. Carson lists more “best buys” for the pastoral epistles than for any other book or books and at the very top of his list is Knight’s volume in the NIGTC which he commends as “cautious, conservative and thoughtful.” As you may know, this series is quite technical and requires at least some knowledge of Greek. If you know Greek and are teaching or preaching one of the pastoral epistles, you will want to add this volume to your collection post haste.

After commending Knight, Carson also commends Marshall and says his work is “packed with thoughtful, well-written reflection on every issue of importance.” Yet, oddly, Marshall does not believe that the epistles were written by Paul and this, not surprisingly, influences some of his interpretations. Still, it receives high recommendations and will prove valuable, especially for the teacher or preacher.

The experts all recommend this one. Keith Mathison writes, “Many will recognize William D. Mounce as the author of the widely used Basics of Biblical Greek Grammar. His commentary on the Pastoral Epistles in the Word series is very helpful. Mounce thoroughly discusses all of the important issues raised by Paul (whom he believes wrote these epistles), and when dealing with controversial parts of the letters, he fairly represents those with whom he disagrees. All in all, a very good commentary.”

While not as technical as George Knight’s volume, this one still weighs in at a hefty 900 pages and should probably be the first choice for teacher or preachers who do not have knowledge of Greek and, therefore, cannot get a lot out of the NIGTC. Towner provides a conservative interpretation that assumes Pauline authorship.

I always try to include at least one volume that is reader-friendly and suitable for someone who wants to do a relatively light study. Guthrie’s fits the bill. He writes from a conservative position, addresses those who take an opposing view, and then helpfully opens up the three epistles. Anyone will be able to read, understand, and enjoy it.