- RSS FeedSubscribe
- « Previous PostA La Carte (09/14)
- Next Post »Friday Miscellania
The Ambiguously Cured Soul
- 09/14/06
- 19
Yesterday my friend Justin Taylor (I think he's everybody's friend, actually. I've been meaning to ask him--is there a Reformed author whose Justin hasn't spoken to just a couple of days ago?), sent me an article entitled "The Ambiguously Cured Soul" that was written by David Powlison and published in the Spring 2001 edition of The Journal of Biblical Counseling. It is a fascinating article and Justin was kind enough to ask if I could post it on my site. Dr. Powlison was equally kind to agree to this. I would encourage you to work through the six-page article before reading the following commentary on it. It is in PDF format and you can access it here.
Powlison frames this article around the story of Amelia, a woman who struggles with lesbian fantasies and whose story appeared in the journal of a Christian counseling center. Here is a portion of Amelia's story:
The idea of counseling scared the wits out of me. I'd never told anyone my struggle. I'd had lots of friends, was always popular and vivacious. People liked me, but I always thought, "If they knew the real me, I'd be rejected." So I never let anyone in. They'd think I was some weird and dangerous pervert, though I'd never acted out my fantasies. I never consciously chose to have lesbian desires. It seemed like something that just happened to me as a child, a decision made for me, something I "discovered" inside me, not something I decided."So what happened? My therapist accepted me. That allayed my anxieties. As we worked in counseling over the next year and a half, he helped me to understand the reasons for my lesbian attraction. My father had been an alcoholic. When I was a child he beat me often, and sometimes sexually molested me. His anger scared me--it still does. I learned never to trust men, and to look towards women for love. But my mom was mostly helpless and passive through it all, preoccupied with her own troubles. She could never really protect or comfort me. So I spent my life trying to meet my need for love that no one had ever met. That parental combination made me hungry for an intimate, accepting relationship with a woman, a "precious friend" who'd fill the empty space inside.
Counseling taught me a perspective on my past, to see how the pain and disappointment of my family upbringing produced my struggles with lesbian fantasy. I've learned to understand why I am the way I am. These realizations about my past have helped me to make better choices in the present. My counselor helped me to learn that only God can fill the void inside me, and can quench my deep thirst for an accepting relationship.
God has been at work in me. Jesus was "tempted in all ways as we are, yet without sin," and I've learned more and more to come to Him, and that He will "never leave me nor forsake me." I've become accountable to my husband and a couple of female friends at church, not just to my therapist. I've learned to identify the situations when I'm tempted to old patterns of fantasy, and to resist more effectively. Praise Him that I am changing!
This seems to be a wonderful story of healing. Amelia came to understand the source of the sins with which she struggled and found useful ways of dealing with them when they strike at her. But, while affirming that Amelia seems to be a "sincere sheep, wanting her Shepherd's presence, and wanting to put secret sin to death, ... it appears that her counselor nourished her with a mixture of Bible truths, half-truths, and fictions." The Holy Spirit was good to animate the biblical truths and to bear fruit in her life. And yet her life now bears an interpretive map that offers confusion and error. Amelia is an ambiguously cured soul.
One aspect of David Powlison's ministry that has often challenged me is that he gives no quarter to sin. He never allows sin to be shown to be anything other than what it is: an offense to God that arises from a person's sinful nature. For instance, when speaking of the counselor's method of helping Amelia understand the source of her sin, he writes, "Knowledge of a person's history may be important for many reasons: compassion on sufferers, sympathetic understanding, locating the present within an unfolding story, knowledge of characteristic temptations, and so forth. But it never determines the heart's proclivities and inclinations." We know this because many people experience similar events in their histories and react differently. One woman may indulge in lesbian fantasies, another may drift from man to man, and another may seem to go through life unscathed.
There is a certain mysterious quality to sin that many modern methods of counseling ignore. "Psychodynamic myth has mingled a significant illusion with elements of Christian truth. To say that her lesbian struggles were caused by unhappy childhood circumstances fails to bow before the riddle, unfathomableness, and culpability of sin. Sin is its own final reason. Any theory that claims to explain sin actually falls prey to sin's intellectual effects, and wriggles away from both theological truth and psychological reality. Sin is the deepest explanation, not just one more problem begging for different and "deeper" reasons."
Did you catch that? "Sin is its own final reason." We can only do so much to explain sin, for ultimately, there is a mystery to sin that we just cannot understand. We can attempt to find reasons for our sin, or look into the past to find its source, but in the end, sin is the deepest explanation and the final reason.
But this is not the purpose of Powlison's article. The article shows something that has been discussed a fair bit in the Christian blogosphere: so often truth and folly are bound up together. "Things would be nice and tidy if you could always keep the good guys straight from the bad guys. But often it's not possible. The same person who is a primary means of grace to another may also be a secondary means of confusion--or a primary means of confusion and a secondary means of grace. We consciously aim to disciple others in the truths we know and seek to live - but others easily catch our errors, blind spots, and failings in the bargain!" Where there is sin, and sin exists in all of us, there will be confusion. Where there is truth there is so often error. This ambiguity is constant. There are not always good guys and bad guys. Rather, often the good guys are the bad guys.
To learn more about Dr. Powlison, visit CCEF. You may also be interested in reading his book Seeing With New Eyes. This article has been reprinted as one chapter in that book and the approach is extended and applied to other issues such as motivation, defense mechanisms, feelings, and love languages.

I am a follower of Jesus Christ, a husband to Aileen and a father to three young children. I write books and blogs for fun while doing web design and consulting for a living. I worship and serve at 
Comments (19)
Are you having a problem with your RSS feeder? I haven't gotten any updates from on my Bloglines account since 9/11.
Thanks for letting me know, Sam. I've noticed my RSS stats are a bit low (about 300 lower than usual). It seems that the Bloglines users are the ones who have disappeared. I'll look into it.
Good little read Tim. So true. Some things might incline us towards certain types of sin but it is never the final reason for it. Sin requires not reason, only a foothold. Thanks.Nanp.s. Hmmm... Why do I get the feeling that David Powlison might be your first interviewee in the series? :^D (Do I get a pat on the back if you picked my recommendation from the other day?? If so I'll have to pass the pat on to my husband because I posted his wishes with mine.) LOL!
"Sin is its own final reason"
That's a profound statement and I believe that the ultimate benefit of counseling will depend on how the counselee receives that statement.
"Where there is truth there is so often error. "
Yes, and as I've always advertised: "If Error is Harmless, then Truth is Useless". We mustn't abandon our pursuit or defense of truth just because we might be a secondary cause of confusion in the process. We have this treasure in earthen vessels but God has chosen to use these means.
"Why do I get the feeling that David Powlison might be your first interviewee in the series?"
He is not, but I'd certainly love to interview him in the future.
"He is not, but I'd certainly love to interview him in the future."
Aww shucks! :^D Still, I look forward to whomever you chose to interview.
Tim, great article, and especially your last paragraph. We mostly want people to be black or white as far as good and evil go, but it's just not the case, because of sin. Thanks a lot for this information.
Wow - I've only read a few pages, but it's powerful stuff. 'Give no quarter to sin', I like that. Having seen my parents waylaid by psychology and "christian counselling", I vigorously support this analysis.
hah, just had a discussion today with my fiancee on how biblical it is to account what our ministry should be to our psychological makeup. it's a complex issue! it seems like pscologically, you can be accurate in describing trends and traits in a person's behavior--but like I told her, Romans 7:18 "For I know that nothing good dwells in me", and that because of the crookedness of sin, when grace comes in and sanctifies, it can sanctify ALL of you, even your personality which you might think is somehow "neutral". what a wise approach to the battle: we must not give quarter to sin and believe we are united to our inclinations!I told her how, out of anyone, Jesus is the most human human, and it's not in human psychological conditions we are human, but in Christ's likeness
hi, I'm a lurker commenting for the first time. I just wanted to say that I really enjoy your site and the in-depth commentaries on books.I've gotten a better perspective on my own beliefs by observing the way you delineate yours. And I've been using some of your well-worded thoughts to debate the "generous orthodoxy" that's been invading my church.Thanks.
I read this article a while back, and it really helped. My 'counselling' experience was based on the practices of Ellel Grange, and not only were my dysfunctional parents to blame for my sins, my long dead jewish ancestors and the little bit gypsy on my mothers side.
I might get around to blogging it one day. But this article was a really helpful one to me, for sure.
Excellent article - and very helpful to me on a personal level, as I am just beginning to do battle for my son, who recently told me he believes he is bisexual. My son grew up without a father and I do believe the desire for a relationship with him has consequently been sexualized to some extent. Though that may in fact be the case, SIN has enticed him and his own lusts are carrying him away and I must never forget that or my prayers for him will not be as effective as they might be. This has been a TOUGH one for me to negotiate thus far, but I am determined to continue to show my son the love of Christ while "giving no quarter to sin." I rely on my Father to give me the grace I need to do this - to love as Christ loves while upholding the holy character and nature of God. Not an easy task for one as fallen as myself!
thank you for sharing this information.
i studied nouthetic counseling (i hate the phrase christian counseling) at southeastern baptist seminary. since graduating from that program it's become painfully clear to me that "christian" counseling is not usually biblical. too much psychology is mixed in and, as in ameilia's case, sin is excused by some past event that the counselee had no control over.
when i mention my thoughts on counseling and "psychological" disorders christians, even christian "counselors" tend to look at me as if I've grown two extra heads. i tend to think we can thank all the "seeker-friendly" churches for that. we can no longer preach that sin has consequences or that sin is a choice. we must cater to what the people want and too often they want what the secular world (and psychologists) have to offer.
it's a sad, sad thing that so many people could be healed from their "psychological" disorders if they simply called upon Christ and admitted their sinfulness.
sorry for the rant.
This has been an interesting read. I wonder what my friends over at Rosemead School of Psychology would say.
I've always thought that counseling (even so-called biblical counseling) seemed to hit sin from the wrong angle (similar, in fact, to sociology which seems to find the problem for all sin in the world around us, rather than in our hearts). I've just never seen so many people who would agree.
-mike
Good response to this article, I must have missed it when it first came out. First, my encouragement to the anonymous commenter concerning his son. Way to stick with him in a godly way.
Second, as I read what Powlison says, I was convicted by my own tendency to be both a means of grace and confusion in the lives of people around me. Until I got into a leadership position at my church, I don't know that I ever appreciated that all of my words, attitudes, and actions are teaching just as much as my sermons. No wonder Paul wrote, "Take heed unto yourself, and unto your doctrine."
My comment got too long, so I just posted it to my blog. I think Powlison is relying on at least two fallacies (a category mistake about homosexuality as opposed to homosexual sin and a false dichotomy between explaining why something happens and recognizing sin in it, which are not inconsistent in the way he assumes they are). The position he's taking leads eventually to some morally dangerous thinking that I would highly caution against, and I don't think he'd want to endorse those things. See the post for the reasons I think this.
Jeremy, with all due respect, having read your blog post, I think your understanding of the matter seems to be far more morally dangerous than does Powlison's. You create a false dichotomy between thoughts/desires and acts. You seem to suggest that sin doesn't enter the picture until we act on our sinful desires. The desires themselves are morally neutral then? You can't come to this conclusion if you've read and understood what Jesus ever said about sin.Perhaps I have just grossly misunderstood you though. That is always a possibility.Nan
Nan, see my response on the post that your comment is about. What you're attributing to me is not my view and not what I said.
"He never allows sin to be shown to be anything other than what it is: an offense to God that arises from a person's sinful nature."
If sin is only ever the overflow of a sinful nature... then Adam & Eve did something other than "sin" at the Fall, because they had no sinful nature before it.