- RSS FeedSubscribe
- « Previous PostA La Carte (3/26)
- Next Post »Reading "The Cross He Bore"
Reading the Classics - Real Christianity (IV)
- 03/26/09
- 9
We continue today with our effort to read through William Wilberforce’s Real Christianity. As you know, this book seeks to help the reader discern true faith from false beliefs. This week we come to the third chapter, “Inadequate Conceptions of God and of Christian Behavior.”
Incidentally, if you are interested in hearing a bit about “Reading the Classics” you can listen to the latest Boundless Show podcast. I was a guest on the show to talk about these books we are reading.
Discussion
Wilberforce begins this chapter by laying out some of the very basic beliefs of the Christian faith and says that few churchgoers are so attentive as to be entirely ignorant of them. His concern, though, is that people can hear such great truths about human sin and God’s redemption and remain unmoved and unaffected. “Let the most superficial observer compare the sentiments and views of the bulk of the Christian world with the articles of faith that still appear in their creed. An amazing discrepancy must strike him! Thus, in the minds of the crowd, religion appears to be wholly excluded from the business world and the vanities of life.” In other words, the creed people profess seems to have no bearing on their lives. Says Wilberforce, “Vainly you strive to bring them around to speak on this topic. One would expect the subject of God to be uppermost in the hearts of redeemed sinners. But they elude all your endeavors. If you make mention of it yourself, they do not give it a cordial welcome; indeed they greet it with unequivocal disgust. At best the discussion remains forced and formal.”Wilberforce uses this chapter to write about four topics, all of which fit under the heading of “Inadequate Conceptions of God and of Christian Behavior.” He says that people have an inadequate conception of Christianity as a faith. This is shown in an inadequate appreciation of Christ, an inadequate appreciation of the Holy Spirit and inadequate conception of Christian behavior. He then looks to the validity of emotions within religion, carefully defending his view that, though professed Christians have long turned to emotional fanaticism instead of true belief, it is presumptuous “to propose excluding from the Christian religion such a large part of the composition of man.” “Surely our all-wise Creator had just as valuable a purpose in giving us the elemental qualities and original passions of the mind as He did in giving us the organs of the body.” Our emotions must be subject to our reason, but they must still be exercised. And how do we know if these emotions are being used properly? We can simply ask this: “Do they motivate the love that keeps His commandments?”
He turns in the third place to inadequate conceptions of the Holy Spirit’s operations, saying “the tendency prevalent among the bulk of nominal Christians is to form a religious system for themselves, instead of taking it from the Word of God.” We see this in the neglect of the doctrine of the influence of the Holy Spirit. People prefer to follow their own religious systems instead of relying on the Spirit to point us to God’s religious system. And finally, Wilberforce looks at mistaken conceptions of the terms of acceptance with God. Such theology is, of course, absolutely foundational the Christian faith. “If anything is unsound and hollow here, the superstructure cannot be safe. That is why it is important to ask the nominal Christian about the means of a sinner’s acceptance by God.” Here we will find that many people rely wholly or substantially on their own efforts, not believing or understanding that the Christian must depend entirely on Christ.
I enjoyed these closing remarks:
The title of Christian is a reproach to us if we turn ourselves away from Him after whom we are named. The name of Jesus is not to be like Allah of the Muhammadans, or like a talisman or amulet, worn on the arm as an external badge and symbol of a profession, thought to preserve one from evil by some mysterious and unintelligible potency.
Instead, we should allow the name of Jesus to be engraved deeply on the heart, written there by the finger of God Himself in everlasting characters. It is our sure and undoubted title to present peace and future glory. The assurance that this title conveys of a bright turning toward heaven will lighten the burdens and alleviate the sorrows of life.
As I read this book, written centuries ago, I continue to be amazed at its relevance to our day. As the French say, plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose (The more things change, the more they stay the same).

I am a follower of Jesus Christ, a husband to Aileen and a father to three young children. I worship and serve as a pastor at 

Releasing on April 1, The Next
Comments (9)
As you said, the correlations between Wilberforce’s original audience and the church of today continue to be striking. I, too, broke the book down in parts and discussed each in my blog post (actually a two part post). In addition, I used a section of the same two paragraphs in closing, although I believe my comments were they were ‘convicting’ not necessarily enjoyable :-)
The only comment I would make is, with the state of the church in America, as I read through Wilberforce’s list of ‘basic’ doctrines, I found myself wondering how many church attendees had, in fact, even heard all these truths preached from the pulpit. I am certain there are some ‘so-called’ churches which either fail to proclaim these truths or, at best, give them a passing glance.
If anyone is interested, my review is posted at:http://christianlivingtoday.today.com/2009/03/25/real-christianity-chapter-three-part-1-of-2/
Thanks again for sharing this wonderful book and your insights with us.
Lerrina
As I was reading this chapter, I too was struck with the similarities in our day. I don’t think though that it tells us that we just have overlapping congruities from Wilberforce’s time. All and every generation faces the same things. Read Revelation and the Letter to the Seven Churches. You will find the same actions and attitudes of John’s audience as well.
Nice post Tim.
Although I too see a correlation between our churches and the churches of Wilberforce’s time in terms of a lack of sound doctrine, I also think Wilberforce would be very disappointed in churches with sound doctrine who lack any emotion whatsoever.
I am in full agreement that doctrine and right thinking comes first, but that should lead to appropriate ‘religious affections’.
At any rate, I focused on how Wilberforce tests and measures the affections:
The final criterion for the author is an all-encompassing pragmatic ‘true test and measure of the religious affections’; do they result in dutiful living in one’s personal, family, professional and social life. For, in Wilberforce’s words, “we must examine whether, above all, they manifest themselves by prompting to the active discharge of the duties of life, the personal, the domestic, the professional, the social, and civil duties.” (57) For the author, the proof of the pudding is in the eating!
Read the rest here.
Great post Tim.
As noted in the posts above…it is striking how two cultures set in two different eras are so remarkably similar.
Jude:
I agree. For me, the chunk of this chapter you mentioned was very convicting. I have always been in a, uh, conservative (in the emotional sense here) church. The outward focus of joy is a bit out of my comfort zone. So this was a very striking set of reading for me.
And to ditto everyone else, I was astounded as I read at the similarities (though to a degree this is heightened by the editorial nature of the chosen publisher).
I am struggling to keep pace so I was a bit down to see that we’re going through chapter 4 (Similar to Martin Short who is “not that strong of a swimmer”, I’m not that strong of a reader…..but this is what challenges like this are all about!).
As usual, thanks for the great stuff to read!
My mind hit upon Wilberforce’s emphasis on the “affections” as well, which seems to be a more common theme among the Reformed of his day. John Piper, of course, labors like crazy to bring this into prominence, esp. with Edwards being his mentor; but it always strikes me afresh. I think it is scary for many in our age because our experience of strong and abiding affection and emotion toward God is thin, and so we want to reassure ourselves that it is no indispensable part of faith. But reading Wilberforce, one finds that it is indispensable. I continue to wrestle with this myself.
p.63 “We repeat them by rote, assuming the language of deepest humility and warmest thankfulness, with a calm, unaltered composure.”Does this remind anybody of worship music today? It may move some, but to most we’re just reciting something without any affection.
If we better grasped how horrible our sin is, we could better grasp how glorious God’s grace is.
I may try the test Wilberforce suggests: engage in a conversation about religion and see if talk centers only on generalities, or can we talk specifics, too? And if we can’t talk specifics, does that mean we haven’t contemplated Christ and his love enough in our private lives?
I loved the imagery in the closing paragraph of God’s finger engraving “Jesus” on our hearts, making our burdens lighter and our joys fuller.
Tim, I listened to your podcast today on Boundless about the book club and reading classics. Inspiring!
My review of chapter 3 is here.
Without the knowledge of our inherent sin nature “the logic of God’s grace becomes meaningless.” Precisely what is happening in a ton of churches right now.
“The mode and language in which an uneducated person will express himself on the subject of true religion will probably be uneducated.” - I had to laugh at this one.
“Even in our own times - when the extraordinary operations and miraculous gifts of the Holy Spirit have ceased - it is necessary for me to study, prepare, and give attention to manner as well as matter.” - wait, you mean speaking in tongues wasn’t in the 1700s either? We’re to give attention to “manner” - now there’s an idea that is NEVER preached in the pulpit.
“It is also necessary to guard against the view that one can estimate the quality of the religious affections chiefly by the degree of ardors, transports, raptures, or mere animal fervors to which a person by temperament is susceptible.” - No way. My favorite Wilberforce quote so far.
great stuff, I can’t believe I hadn’t read this book already