Best Commentaries on Ephesians

This is a trusted commentator writing for a relatively new commentary series.

Chapell has written a number of highly regarded books and commentaries. This one is based on sermons so is especially easy to read.

The Lectio Continua Expository Commentary on the New Testament is a relatively new series that features some well known Reformed pastors and scholars.

When O’Brien’s volume was withdrawn, it left a hole at the top of this list and in the Pillar series itself. This is the volume Eerdmans commissioned to fill it, and it does so worthily. Douglas Moo says it “bears all the hallmarks of the Pillar series: clear exposition, grounded in adequate research, with attention both to the details of the text and to the broader argument,” and remarks that its more informal style “makes reading the commentary a refreshing experience.” Brian Rosner finds it “both exegetically convincing and theologically rich. Highly recommended for scholars, students, and pastors.” Campbell defends Paul’s authorship (no small thing on this letter) and makes union with Christ the organizing theme.

Here is an unusual one. Lincoln’s commentary receives near-unanimous praise and is considered one of the best treatments of Ephesians even though Lincoln denies that Paul wrote the letter and attempts to prove his case. (O’Brien apparently answers him convincingly.) Apart from that misstep in authorship, this is apparently an excellent volume that is faithful to the text and draws out important theological reflections.

This is a massive volume that weighs in at almost 1,000 pages. Keith Mathison says, “In terms of sheer size and scope (960 pages), Harold Hoehner’s commentary on Ephesians is the place to turn for those seeking a comprehensive conservative evangelical treatment of this epistle.” Mathison particularly commends Hoehner’s treatment of the authorship of Ephesians. He also notes that Hoehner is dispensational and that this theology is evident in in several places.

Bruce’s contribution to the NICNT is a substantial work that covers not only Ephesians, but Colossians and Philemon as well. From what I have read, there is a consider fall-off in quality between the first three recommendations and those that follow, so this volume is probably more of a luxury than a necessity.

I always like to include at least one relatively short, readable, popular-level commentary for those who may be looking for a simpler treatment of the text. Stott’s work has received excellent reviews and fits the criteria. I always benefit from Stott’s commentaries and have referred to this one many times.