Best Commentaries on Ezra & Nehemiah

Thomas is a skilled and trustworthy expositor who has completed a good number of excellent commentaries. I have little doubt that this sermon-based commentary will join the ranks of the top recommendations.

– Ezra & Nehemiah: The Quest for Restoration (Focus on the Bible Commentary). The general rule is that if you are studying a book and Dale Ralph Davis has written a commentary on it, you should use that commentary! (, , )

Most commentators on the commentaries rate this as the best volume on Ezra and Nehemiah. Fensham takes the traditional approach to the books’ dating, authorship and other elements. His strength is apparently in his emphasis on history and culture. Jim Rosscup says this commentary is “an evangelical effort knowledgeably rich in exegesis with a firm grasp of Hebrew, matters of introduction, and solid explanation of many of the verses.”

There is not only near-consensus on the best commentary on Ezra and Nehemiah, but also near-consensus on the second best–Williamson’s contribution to the WBC. Williamson takes a more scholarly and technical approach than Fensham, making this a little bit more difficult to read. His strength is in word study, background, customs and the like. With Fensham this should make a pretty good one-two punch in understanding and interpreting the text.

Just a few days ago I was reading a commentary by Kidner and remarking on his ability to distill each section of Scripture down to its essence and follow his explanation with useful application. His commentary on Ezra and Nehemiah is necessarily succinct, due to the limitations of the TOTC, but is apparently excellent and the best place to go for an entry-level work suitable for all readers.

After the first three volumes, it seems that the quality drops off a little bit (though three commentaries is probably plenty for almost any purpose). Raymond Brown’s contribution to the BST covers only Nehemiah but apparently does so well. The BST is similar to the TOTC in that it is easy to read and geared toward a general audience.

Keith Mathison says, “Breneman’s commentary does not compare with Fensham’s and Williamson’s, but for those seeking helpful summaries of the more technical work that has been done on these books, his is a helpful work.” The other experts seem to agree that it should not be at the top of your list, but that it is helpful in its own right. Rosscup especially commends Breneman for his conservative approach and his insistence on the reliability of the text.